Barr calls judge’s ruling in Trump’s Mar-a-Lago case ‘deeply flawed’

Former President Trump's Attorney General William Barr criticized a decision by Trump-appointed Judge Aileen Cannon to grant Trump's request for a special master. CNN's Eli Honig, Abby Phillip, and John Sale discuss the ruling and Barr's critique.

#cnn
#News

66 comments

    1. @John Herold what does ment mean? You started this whole thing by suggesting…….perhaps we can all agree? I guess you got your answer……..as I said. ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿ˜‚NOPE! Later dude. Good luck! Where did you go to school again? You forgot to mention. ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿคฃ

    2. @8mondaymonkey I’m sorry dude your not a U.S. Citizen don’t need to argue with foreigners I’v got enough Americans to argue with & its not what I want to do. peace

    1. The Enemy of Your enemy…is..Your Friend.
      As of now he wants to see Trump destroyed as much as you do. He has weight in Rino land..they are getting sick of Maagas ..politics makes strange bedfellows. You want Trump gone or don’t you?

    2. I’m surprised you can’t see the relevance. It’s also why people noted Karl Rove’s comments. If people in that position are saying it there is some chance it will break through to people who wouldn’t listen to others. It’s not complex.

  1. It doesn’t matter what Barr says, he should have spoken up way back when he knew how trump was – anyone remember the Mueller report? His shame will last way beyond the grave.

    1. @XVI No, the congressional hearing proved that. Mueller didn’t know about key aspects of his supposed report. Get a clue.

  2. I thought the whole thing was supposed to be about him having Top Secret, Secret, and Confidential documents in his possession. Where in the Executive Previledge clause it states former presidents can exert that to keep those types of materials in their possession after they leave office?

    1. @Trial by Wombat it says acccess, not removal dude, there’s a differnce. if he went to the archives and sat down for an hor to read some documents, that’d probably be okay. But he didn’t do that, did he?

    2. @Barry Lenihan
      I guess we will have to wate for the DOJ to tell us. But given the fact that thay haven’t said that the documents weren’t declassifed …. could mean that thay were. And the fact is if the DOJ had evidence that those documents weren’t declassified you can bet it would be front page news.

    1. @Baan Jones Yeah it does. Tell me how much? I posted proof of what I said. What do you have ? Nothing ๐Ÿ˜

    2. @Whatโ€™s Good My Guy you didnโ€™t have proofโ€ฆ I provided you a link. You have nothing. Your donnie is guilty. People that were covering him are facing indictment. ๐Ÿ˜‚ Iโ€™m loving it. โค๏ธ You are a sucker!!

  3. What Jon Sale spewed is utter nonsesnse – this choice of this judge Aileen Cannon was calculated carefully and she was chosen and picked for a reason. LOT =Love of Trump

  4. Who is going to decide who this said special counsel is? How will they be accurately vetted? Now can we all say it’s not fair and get a special counsel when we are being investigated for a crime? Because we are worried about our reputation? NO!!!

  5. It is amazing to me that people don’t know when too shut up and go about their business, I wouldn’t hire this guy for my divorce lawyer.

  6. The guy on the far right, John Sale, is the one that suggested the Special Master on the news, in a message to the exP. He was like the first atty to turn down the exP to represent him. Heโ€™s the one we have to thank for this messy delay tactic.

  7. What case law “narrowly” says a former president can say he has executive privilege, especially when the current president says he has it?

    1. The narrow scope is that the current executive has the right to assert privilege over materials regarding the previous presidency, particularly in communications with Congress. Which is irrelevant in this case, and Trump doesn’t have the authority to invoke it anyway.

  8. Let’s take everything that Barr says with a grain of salt, including this.
    I’m glad that last person in the last 5 Seconds of this clip explain that this judge was chosen according to the wheel, that is somewhat random.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.