Chris Hayes Podcast With Saule Omarova | Why Is This Happening? – Ep 108 | MSNBC

Are we doing enough to keep the economy alive through this crisis? So far, economic relief efforts have been messy, convoluted, and inequitably distributed. But while we talk about the steps taken to save the economy, we first need to know the structures in which that recovery originates. Who decides where the money goes, how are those decisions being made – and can these mechanisms be more effective? Not just in this current pandemic-induced economic contraction, but on a more permanent institutional level. How can we ensure our financial system is stable enough to weather these types of crises? After dedicating her academic career to answering these types of questions, law professor Saule Omarova joins to discuss her proposal for what that new type of institution can and should look like.
» Subscribe to MSNBC:

MSNBC delivers breaking news and in-depth analysis of the headlines, as well as informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and more.

Connect with MSNBC Online
Visit msnbc.com:
Subscribe to MSNBC Newsletter: MSNBC.com/NewslettersYouTube
Find MSNBC on Facebook:
Follow MSNBC on Twitter:
Follow MSNBC on Instagram:

Chris Hayes Podcast With Saule Omarova | Why Is This Happening? – Ep 108 | MSNBC

23 comments

    1. Who is “Haines”, fuckstain? Once again, you’re so blinded by rage and stupidity, you don’t even know to whom you’re screaming at. 😂😂😂

    2. @CShield @Carlos Stranger clearly didn’t make it through high school…otherwise he would know how to construct a complete sentence.

  1. I have an attitude, Hazy, this girl worked for Bush in the Treasury? Did she write the hand off to Obama?. Now can we call that a Russian Recession, and the Russian housing bust with some of the biggest bankruptcies of the time. (i.e. Enron etc.) Sound like she has a Phd in economic chaos a “perfect call” to replace Mnuchin.

  2. Thank you Chris for making this one happen. I want to “follow the money”
    on this one AND see how it might be done better. I might have to go through
    this podcast 3 or 4 or 5 times before I understand everything here, but I
    wouldn’t have you change anything. I may or may not agree with everything
    here once I understand it, but that’s less important than having my mind opened
    to new ideas. I love your work!

    1. growing government might be socialism. communism doesn’t necessarily mean big government. communism means that enterprises belong to community members. so community members are ultimate decision makers and owners.

    2. @Gulzada Serzhan WE NEED A FINANCIAL ENTITY THAT CAN AND WILL TAKE ON THE FINANCIAL TASK OF DEVELOPING “LFTR” NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY.
      THERE’S VERY LITTLE PROFIT IN OWNING A “LFTR” NUCLEAR REACTOR, BUT “LFTR” REACTORS WILL DEFINITELY HELP SAVE MANKIND.

  3. It is not hard for me to let big oil fail. The auto company would start building electric. The oil ompanies have taken our environment for granted. We have been paying for them to have a job, while their job destroys the air we breath, and they have spilled hundreds of billions of gallons of oil into the oceans, and they have created a whole economy based on using, and theowing away. This has to stop at some point. Now is fine with me. People should be operating up solor panel manufacturing plants and hiring people away from these oil company jobs. If we bail out the oil company, then the switch to clean electric will never happen.

  4. China is going to leave us behind with the products of the future. We are stuck in our old ways.

    1. CHINA IS ALREADY INVESTING IN “LFTR” NUCLEAR REACTOR TECHNOLOGY.
      WE NEED A FINANCIAL ENTITY THAT CAN AND WILL TAKE ON THE FINANCIAL TASK OF DEVELOPING “LFTR” NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY.
      THERE’S VERY LITTLE PROFIT IN OWNING A “LFTR” NUCLEAR REACTOR, BUT “LFTR” REACTORS WILL DEFINITELY HELP SAVE MANKIND.

  5. You need to talk about our electric grid. If it fails , we are thrown into the dark ages.
    We should be planning for the next best technology to take over electric production and storage.
    Clean, more efficient, inexpensive, and more abundant. Most of all more reliable. One hundred thousand people lose power every time the wind blows or lightning strikes.
    We could figure this out, but people will not be motivated to change until the old system is broken. Then the temptation to rebuild the old system may overpower the need for us to develop a new system.

    1. WE NEED A FINANCIAL ENTITY THAT CAN AND WILL TAKE ON THE FINANCIAL TASK OF DEVELOPING “LFTR” NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY.
      THERE’S VERY LITTLE PROFIT IN OWNING A “LFTR” NUCLEAR REACTOR, BUT “LFTR” REACTORS WILL DEFINITELY HELP SAVE MANKIND.

  6. WE NEED A FINANCIAL ENTITY THAT CAN AND WILL TAKE ON THE FINANCIAL TASK OF DEVELOPING “LFTR” NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY.
    THERE’S VERY LITTLE PROFIT IN OWNING A “LFTR” NUCLEAR REACTOR, BUT “LFTR” REACTORS WILL DEFINITELY HELP SAVE MANKIND.

  7. Any hybrid financial entity will inevitably be nothing more than a slush fund for the 1% to raid. The Fed & State governments haven’t shown any interest to invest in projects that would benefit their populace, let alone the planet. I mean seriously, if they wanted to show some concern for their citizens start with Flint Michigan, their water issues are still going on years after it was in the headlines. The corruption has been allowed to thrive for decades, and it’s too late now to change a culture that’s been given the time and space to develop for this magical hybrid to create even the appearance of a fair system that benefits anyone not part of the 1%.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.