Fmr. Rep. Katie Hill On Her Lawsuit Against The Daily Mail, Allegations Against Matt Gaetz | MSNBC

This week, a judge ruled The Daily Mail did not violate California law when it posted private sexual images of former Congresswoman Katie Hill (D-CA). Hill joined NBC’s Joshua Johnson to discuss her ongoing legal fight and commented on the allegations of inappropriate behavior against her former colleague, Representative Matt Gaetz (R-FL).» Subscribe to MSNBC:

MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, Meet the Press Daily, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House with Nicolle Wallace, Hardball, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and more.

Connect with MSNBC Online
Visit msnbc.com:
Subscribe to MSNBC Newsletter:
Find MSNBC on Facebook:
Follow MSNBC on Twitter:
Follow MSNBC on Instagram:

Fmr. Rep. Katie Hill On Her Lawsuit Against The Daily Mail, Allegations Against Matt Gaetz | MSNBC

41 comments

  1. Chris Hansen: “Matt, why don’t you have seat. Yeah, have a seat right here”😂

    Matt: “So can I leave now?”

    Chris Hansen: “Sure, you can walk right out that door.” 😂

    1. @Tsubadai Khan – it’s not grammar. Knowing that ‘should of’ is incorrect, and ‘should have’ is correct, is just knowing the correct words 👍

    2. Only Democrats seem to have enough ethics and honour to resign over even an unproven accusation of impropriety… Al Franken… Republicans seem to almost wear it as a badge… Matt Gaitz… Stay safe ✌️🇨🇦😷

  2. Keep after them Katie!!! You are so lucky to be rid of that jerk. This is simply disgusting! CA will have to get busy stopping this inequity in the law,

  3. If you asked journalists around the world which they hate more – Fox News in the US, or The Daily Malicious on this side of the pond, that would be a very, very difficult question for us all to answer. Which scrapes the bottom of the barrel more?

    1. They’re both rags but I think Fox is worse. The Mail is salacious, sexist and racist but doesn’t usually outright lie for months about verifiable facts such as whether or not there was widespread election fraud.

    2. Both awful but Fox is way worse. There’s very little difference between Fox and North Korean state news.

    3. @Alli P The Daily Mail has such a record of fabrication and falsification that Wikipedia no longer accepts it as a credible source and does not allow it to be cited.
      Having said that, the way Fox News have allowed themselves to become little more than Trump’s PR operation and how they have been firmly standing behind and promoting the Great Lie, is way beyond even the wildest excesses of the Daily Mail. It has become a pernicious, seditious influence on US politics and on social discourse in general.

  4. I agree with Katie. What the public is interested in and what is in the public interest are not necessarily the same thing. The Daily Mail could have run the story without printing the photos. The public interest isn’t served by everyone seeing Katie’s hoo haa.

  5. That is an absolutely disgusting ruling. The judge who ruled that way ought to have nude pictures of them published. It would be just as appropriate.

    1. I wonder if he’d would do the same if it would be his daughters pictures going around the internet..

    2. US justice system is broken. The whole thing needs an overhaul, in particular how judges are appointed. At the moment the woman holding the scales aloft has been made a servant of the plutocracy, as has the US Govt. There are only so many band-aids that can be plastered over cracked statues.

  6. Whoever the judge is might want to reconsider because there is the possibility that someone in his family could be subject to the same process 😱

    1. I remember when this story broke. One of the news chans showed her nude smoking a glass bong. I wouldn’t vote for her after seeing that. We expect better behavior from a congresswoman.

    2. @Brandy Courvoisier Better behavior? Pot is legal in California, and so is nudity in one’s home. You’re OK with countless male congressmen, who get drunk and harass women, some underage, but are against a woman smoking pot, naked, in her own home. What a hypocrite! The crime here is posting of naked photos of her, not her being naked.

  7. Out of curiosity how many illicit girlfriends or exgirlfriends of judges have images of them in compromising positions?! I bet the laws would change then to ban the publishing of them if they ever came ro light

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.