Gwyneth Paltrow asked about Taylor Swift during civil trial

During Gwyneth Paltrow's civil trial over a 2016 ski incident, Terry Sanderson's attorney asked if Paltrow was seeking $1 in damages because she was inspired by Taylor Swift's lawsuit in 2017 against radio host David Mueller, who she had said groped her at a meet-and-greet event in June 2013.#CNN #News #shorts

24 comments

  1. SOMEONE ACTUALLY CARES WHAT THIS LAWSUIT ENTAILS? GWYNETH IS RELEVANT? GIVE ME A BREAK! THERE IS A WAR IN EUROPE!!!😡👎👎

  2. Why does it matter if she knows Taylor Swift? Or if she was inspired by her $1 lawsuit? The attorney is just throwing shade because Gwyneth is famous. Not that I like her, just on a moral level…it doesn’t matter if she is friends with TS or not. It’s completely irrelevant.

  3. One dollar is the lowest amount a lawsuit can legitimately ask for. You’re basically telling everyone the person you are suing doesn’t have enough money and wouldn’t pay it if they did so the dollar allows someone to get a moral victory.

  4. Making money is an action. Keeping money is behavior, but “growing money is wisdom”. I found this out a week ago after getting a $10,000 return on my $3,000 investment in 21 days.

    1. Ernest Bryant is the only one I can leave my investment with and think less about it, he is my money maker. I just received $24,300 of my investment last month. I am very happy because he is leading me to financial freedom.

    2. Personally as a first time investor, I started trading with $1,000 now my portfolio is worth $5,400 within the space of few weeks trading with him

  5. Does this lawyer asking know Giuliani very well? What a stupid question to ask, assuming everyone in Hollywood knows each other. Like these people aren’t off filming movies or in a studio, about to go on a lengthy tour. As if the two are neighbors or something…

  6. Are they stupid? The guy bumped into her. Its not her fault, how she reacted to what happened to him should not cost her 3mln ffs. Its his own fault

  7. What does that have to do with this case? People are allowed to sue for one dollar and it happens all the time. This case is a joke. Their evidence is an unrelated swift case? Dumb

  8. Listen everybody, I think it best if we get back to a trial that has true merit and was not frivolous. The Johnny Depp and Amber Heard trial left me devastated because of its importance to humanity. Lol Sometimes I am embarrassed to be a human. Just saying.

  9. If I had been ‘ spread eagled’ by Gwyneth Paltrow I would be suing myself for not having got a second date !!.. skis or not !!

  10. The aura of pretentiousness Paltrow emanates with kind of makes me actively root against her.

  11. Taylor must be disappointed to be dragged into this dreadful line of questioning-it cheapens the Judge’s courtroom

  12. One dollar is symbolic because she’s protecting her reputation, not trying to win more money nor hurt anyone.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.