“If What We Are Talking About Is Not Impeachable, Nothing Is” – Day That Was | MSNBC

The House Judiciary Committee held its first impeachment hearing Wednesday, with three of the four eminent legal scholars overwhelmingly concluding that the evidence against Trump showed he had committed impeachable actions. Aired on 12/05/19.
» Subscribe to MSNBC:

MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, Meet the Press Daily, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House with Nicolle Wallace, Hardball, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and more.

Connect with MSNBC Online
Visit msnbc.com:
Subscribe to MSNBC Newsletter:
Find MSNBC on Facebook:
Follow MSNBC on Twitter:
Follow MSNBC on Instagram:

"If What We Are Talking About Is Not Impeachable, Nothing Is” – Day That Was | MSNBC

60 comments

    1. @Dave Schultz ,
      Apparently you like whataboutisms, when you have no defense, you say, what about what he/she or group of people may have done wrong to deflect from that which there is no defense. This is far more than democrats and republicans, but the future of our country, our democracy and above all our constitution. If you can’t comprehend the gravity of the abuse of power of our executive branch, as well as the checks and balances of our three branches of government. It doesn’t matter which party Trump belong too, or who he is as a person. This goes to the erosion of our rule 9f law and our national security by our President not only allowing a foriegn government interfering in our election, but soliciting a foriegn government to interfere for his own personal interest. Let me ask you all, how would you be thinking of everything else is the same except that Trump was a democrat. Would you still be defending him or calling for his immediate impeachment and removal from office? What says you? What is.more important to you, the future of our president or the future of our country?

    2. tom schmidt
      That is a blatant lie, and you’re fully aware it is.
      tRump has detained more, and deported fewer, creating a humanitarian crisis.
      He’s underfunded the effort, and innocent humans are not receiving food or medical rations, clean facilities, or proper hygiene.

      You’re liters
      Let supporting concentration camps…

      And how telling you’re a victim of misinformation.

    3. @tom schmidt Obama kicked out more illegal immigrants then any prior president. He did not lock up any children. That “Obama locked up more Illegal Immigrant children than All other presidents combined” is disinformation spread by Donald Trump.

      You should fact check yourself before you call others lemmings.

    1. Trumpocalypse
      Breath in
      Breath out
      Repeat
      Do Not Forget!
      TRUMP 2020
      (Get out of mommy’s basement & see the real world)
      KAG!

    1. @Trumpocalypse Please, enlighten us to what crimes were committed here, that were greater than Obama’s crimes of giving the Cartels and the enemy terrorists arms and aid. Then explain to me why it is not permissible for Trump to spy on Democrat candidates like Obama spied on Trump. Then explain how Clinton lost an election when they were spying on the Trump campaign and the election was all but fixed in her favor. I am waiting.

    2. @Deanya Schempp Perhaps we should have a talk with Syracuse University and the Trailer Trash Tramp they employ? I don’t think they want an issue with a Cyber Security pro. Good luck dealing with the Dean after I talk to them.

    3. @benny6462601 Who are you to speak up using GOP/UDSSR talking points? Just 1 look at your profile tells me that you a the crack-smoking-fuggnugget that is destroing your Country. Will enjoy kicking your butt with the AEF (Allied European Forces) toremove the Hitler you voted in. Maybe my grand, grand parents did that but right now.. you are the enabler. Hoping history will spit on you as you do on Europeans. Cheers from Germany.

  1. If you look really, really close, you can see how none of them state any of the “facts” that support impeachment.

    1. The fact that supports impeachment starts with obstruction.
      When your mother — and our governmental oversight committees are supposed to be exactly that, asks you where you were yesterday, you’d better answer her. And not only did Trump not answer the oversight governing offices of the United States of America, he bad-mouthed our CIA, our FBI, and our long-time apolitical foreign service officers.
      That fact alone supports impeachment — we cannot have a president who does not respect checks and balances, and who seeks to subvert them by putting corrupt people into positions of high service.

    2. ​@markj6700 All you have is words and data points NPC. No FACTS . I have more evidense in your replies that you are sleep walking than Congress has to move forward to impeach. Sleep well…OK?

  2. Michael Gerhardt, Professor
    Pamela S. Karlan, Professor
    Pramila Jayapal, D, Judiciary Committee
    Noah Feldman, Professor
    Elizabeth Warren, Senator

    1. Tom Jones I believe she is, But they’re not always like this. They normally start out much smaller during their indoctrination program. After about 16 years of being fed Steer manure and plant food, they become what you see here today. Commies!!

      “ give me their children and I will own their future “
      Adolf Hitler

    2. Trumpocalypse
      YOUR PRESIDENT!
      or
      YOUR PRESIDENT for 5 more years!
      That was easy.
      Is the next question mine?
      Ok
      Did you vote for hrc in 2016?
      NVRMND
      I already know the answer.
      Hahahaha
      TRUMP 2020
      KAG

  3. This is opinion, no evidence. Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler needs to voted out of office. They have proven they don’t care about the people.

    1. The evidence is that you cannot NOT answer to Congress, if you are President.
      We have a system of checks and balances in the U.S. Presidents can legally be checked by Congress, and he would not consent to oversight.
      You do realize that at least SIX people who worked for Trump have been arrested already?
      Why are you so loathe to see what is in front of your face?

  4. What is it with Harvard Law Professors? Do they not understand the concepts of consideration? citizenship? conflicts of interest? the lines where decisions must cross in order to constitute obstruction? If they do understand these concepts, why not teach Stanford law professors and others? At least Pocahontas has been consistent in her blindness to understanding consideration. Some day, the free press (if we have one left when trial by innuendo is over) may even have a hilarious story to tell.

  5. What is most interesting about this whole saga is how much it reveals about the American ruling class and political/educational elite. Their grandstanding speeches, appeals of political purity of purpose, inability to see the reality of the political machine as it exists today, shows what a truly unimpressive and mediocre political class has evolved in the USA.

    Zero doubt these are the same people who talk at university lectures and dinner parties with others in their social standing, about historical events of great empires like the USA, not realizing that when they talk about the self absorbed, self promoting and amazingly incompetent ruling classes of late Rome, Tsarist Russia, and Nationalist China They are talking about people just like themselves…that they don’t realize it speaks volumes.

    1. @Evan Brown How stupid do you have to be in order for your argument to consist of PhD. = Bad/elitist.
      If you don’t know anything about politics then you should defer to the people that have studied it at university.
      80% of voters with a post secondary degree voted for Hillary Clinton, think about that for awhile, 2016 was like a bunch of football players telling a brain surgeon where he should cut next during surgery. You can follow the uneducated, or you can follow the smart people, the choice is yours, please don’t screw this up again in 2020!

    2. @Tidbit study politics at university..😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    3. @sal been Oh yeah, I forgot, MAGA hat wearing dirtbags don’t like education because they cant comprehend anything past the 5th grade! sal been you’re a loser, get lost.

    4. @sal been You are so stupid that you didn’t even read my comment or understand my point, WOW, you’re either incredible stupid or just a bot, so f you Russian or GOP bot!

    1. Deanya Schempp this must be the pinnacle of your academics to come to YouTube to correct grammar. You must be proud of yourself.

    2. @Deanya Schempp Hey stupid, check your own grammar. You have incorrect punctuation in this post. I’ll give you a hint, it is in line 2. You are just another Democrat chastising others for your own shortcomings.

    1. @Annie triggered! 😂 name calling – the last refuge for someone with no argument. 😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢

    1. Right, TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) = To fall for Trump’s easy to see through lies.

      If you think the TDS is bad here, check out the Fox News comments sections. Talk about a lot of mental health issues.

    1. Elaniago

      Exactly, whenever the truth is exposed in congress, the russians come out to try and protect their asset donald judas trump. Its futile, but inevitable. And its futile because at least 50% want trump removed from office, a number greater than any president faced before and a number likely to climb.

      Putin knows, when the traitor trump is gone one way or another, he will fave a stiff breeze blowing from the West once again.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.