Royal resignation frees Harry and Meghan from the “ball and chain” of their titles: Royal historian

Royal historian and biographer William Kuhn discusses Thomas Markle's comments that Harry and Meghan are "throwing away" their titles, and why the royal couple want to be free of their duties.

Subscribe to CTV News to watch more videos:

Connect with CTV News:
For the latest news visit:
For a full video offering visit the CTV News Network:
CTV News on Facebook:
CTV News on Twitter:
Watch CTV News on Twitter:
CTV News on Google+:
CTV News on Instagram:
CTV News on Pinterest:


CTV News is Canada's most-watched news organization both locally and nationally, and has a network of national, international, and local news operations.

43 comments

  1. i do not care about their decisions whenever they go, they pay for everything because they are parent and adults,

    1. @M F Q Agreed! We should not have to pay for multi millionaires security costs to live in our country. Granted I agree they need security measures. But that should not be the Canadian tax payers problem.

  2. Most likely Harry will never become the King, so if his life is to be meaningful, it is honorable to try and make it so.

  3. BBC do mention they will stick amounts to be payed like ‘security’ to London so what do you think happens here

    1. That could never happen, he could never “replace” them, as he is not in direct succession to the throne.

    1. Charlotte Camp – HRH is a style. Their titles are the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and their titles remain. They have chosen not to use HRH when their work does not represent the monarch, but if they return as full time senior royals, the style has not been removed.

    2. @Fred Bone Becauses, of course, you were right there in the midst of the Sandringham Summit and can accurately report exactly what happened.

    3. @sarahspeaks144 πŸ‘πŸΎπŸ‘πŸΎπŸ‘πŸΎπŸ‘πŸΎπŸ‘πŸΎπŸ‘πŸΎπŸ‘πŸΎ

    1. That seems harsh and unnecessarily critical. Harry did a lot as a Royal and was in the army, I think. I don’t see lazy or moochers. What’s with these nasty name-calling accusations?

    2. @Rashone I am sure Ex prince H did alot. The taxpayers know that. He was not the only one who was in the army. Its high time that he gets a job and pays for his own security bill. By the way. Hope he stays in Canada.

    3. @P M Of course he wasn’t the only one who served in the army. I just question the trashy label, “lazy moochers.” “High time” he gets a job and pays for his own security…not relevant when he was a royal so it’s really not “high time”. He and Megan are on their own, so yes, now they have to pay their way.

  4. The key word is “FREEDOM” great for them. Harry will always be “The People’s Prince and you do not need a royal title for that, wtg. I applaud them πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ˜˜πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ’–πŸ’–πŸ’–πŸ’–πŸ’–πŸ’–πŸ’–πŸ’–πŸ’–πŸ’–πŸ’–πŸ’–

  5. OMG what a hard life shaking hands on occasions, go to banquets and smile…and the only pay they get in return is a life in unimaginable luxury …so true, who would want that job?….sigh!

  6. The Queen did strip them of their royal title and all abilities to serve the queen and country….as prince Harry stated in his exit speech it wasn’t his desire but had no choice.

  7. “Ball and chain” that continues to provide great privileges – some others continue to pay for their freedom. Hope they don’t forget that there is more to life than business deals – they have to be sincere and honest to themselves. Remember celebrity is a fickle thing … attention shifts all the time.

  8. Royal duties should only be done by senior members of the royal family, after they’ve worked out they’re useless at everything else.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.