Warren: Just A Little Longer Before We Have A Woman In The White House | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC

Warren: Just A Little Longer Before We Have A Woman In The White House | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC 1

 

Senator Elizabeth Warren talks with Rachel Maddow about the despair some women feel that there will never been a woman in the White House, emphasizing the persistence that change requires. Aired on 3/5/2020.
» Subscribe to MSNBC:

MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, Meet the Press Daily, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House with Nicolle Wallace, Hardball, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and more.

Connect with MSNBC Online
Visit msnbc.com:
Subscribe to MSNBC Newsletter:
Find MSNBC on Facebook:
Follow MSNBC on Twitter:
Follow MSNBC on Instagram:

Warren: Just A Little Longer Before We Have A woman In The White House | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC

51 Comments on "Warren: Just A Little Longer Before We Have A Woman In The White House | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC"

  1. Alex Buchanan | March 6, 2020 at 3:10 AM | Reply

    The trailblazers are the ones that have to deal with thickest thorns. Sometimes even the bravest explorers perish, but it doesn’t mean you stop moving forward and cutting a new path.

  2. Adriano de Jesus | March 6, 2020 at 4:29 AM | Reply

    Don’t listen to corporate Dem consultants next time. You were doing ok before playing patty cakes with establishment people.

    • Yep. I think support for her particularly dropped after she started attacking Sanders in a silly way, and when we started seeing that her plans for medicare were not for all. I can understand her wanting to appeal to the centre and right of the party, that’s politics, but she went too far.

    • yes look how loyal and thankful progressivs are towards their candidate. She should just stick to her progressiv views and be less appologetic about them.

    • Matthew Kopp | March 6, 2020 at 11:30 AM | Reply

      Bingo! I get the game she was trying to play. Bridging the gap. But you cannot bridge the gap with a psychopath like Clinton, she is too far gone. Warren was naïve and willfully blind.

    • Trump has crazies
      Warren has crazies
      Biden has crazies
      But everybody’s pointing the finger at Sanders, go figure
      No wonder the US is such a disgusting mess of a country nowadays, the rest of the world watches in disgust as the backward “leader” of the free world is getting senile/corrupt beyond repair with each passing election

      Also not a single mention of the fact the DNC closed tons of Polling locations in areas more fanourable to Sanders voters. Depressing

    • Steve Sanzari | March 6, 2020 at 8:53 PM | Reply

      She Sucked ! She Lied about her Life from DAY ONE ! She Wasn’t a Native American ! She wasn’t Fired for Being Pregnant ! She can’t Dance ! And she Don’t Drink Beer ! Lies don’t Help get to your Goals !

  3. Thankyou for your service in neutralising Bloomberg before he ruined US democracy.

    • Steve Sanzari | March 6, 2020 at 8:50 PM | Reply

      Warren Did No such Thing ! , Bloomberg Needed NO Help in Destroying his Own Campaign ! He Also was Horrible ! No People Skills !

    • SASHA Savage | March 7, 2020 at 8:17 AM | Reply

      Elizabeth Warren talked about nonbinary driver’s licenses and used the term “traffic violence” when the rest of us say “car crash.” She could have focused on the working class, but chose to focus on the wokest class.

  4. Анита Анита | March 6, 2020 at 5:09 AM | Reply

    Katie Porter is the most eligible for upcoming elections, she need to be groomed….

    • Tulsi is the best candidate on the Dem side. She was labelled a Russian spy obscenely by HRC which begs the question. Will HRC be Biden’s VP?

    • @ntamny Warren was one of her college professors.

    • @ntamny AOC gets so much attention that people like Porter, who’s a bit of protege of Warren’s, does not get so noticed unless one is a politics geek.

    • Matthew Kopp | March 6, 2020 at 11:27 AM | Reply

      Karen Byrd I don’t know who Porter is. But I am 100% confident with AOC eventually. She needs to get more experience in certain areas. The real issue is that progressive candidates in general are threatening, especially those who question foreign policy like Gabbard or Omar or AOC. So it will be difficult.

    • Matthew Kopp | March 6, 2020 at 11:28 AM | Reply

      And I know Omar can’t be president.

  5. Superlative CG | March 6, 2020 at 5:17 AM | Reply

    If Adam Schiff’s wife is President, Adam would be the First Man.

  6. Chinese American | March 6, 2020 at 6:57 AM | Reply

    I want have a woman as president too. But not you, Liz

  7. What is whit tulsi and williamson? why only mention the moderate women?

    • Matthew Kopp | March 6, 2020 at 11:35 AM | Reply

      Luke Visinoni I still support Tulsi. She got endorsement from Kucinich, Gravel, Ron Paul, what would have sealed it for me is if she went to Chomsky. He heard her policies, agreed generally but said I need more details. But she could just call and meet with him.

  8. Michael Rowsell | March 6, 2020 at 10:02 AM | Reply

    Be careful of what you wish for. Trump could make his daughter vice-President in November .Then he retires and the first female President is Ivanka.

  9. Matthew Kopp | March 6, 2020 at 10:17 AM | Reply

    Maddow forgot mentioning Tulsi Gabbard who is still in the race. I wonder why?

    • Raul Esquivel | March 6, 2020 at 10:41 PM | Reply

      5%LowBattery There’s a bigger picture. She’s planting seeds

    • Raul Esquivel | March 6, 2020 at 10:43 PM | Reply

      Amrendra Ray Then by that same token you’re opinion doesn’t matter. Btw fascist does she support Mr investigative reporter?

    • Cameron Luer | March 7, 2020 at 6:15 AM | Reply

      Because she has as much chance of winning as I do 😁

    • Matthew Kopp | March 7, 2020 at 5:19 PM | Reply

      Amrendra Ray Gabbard visited Modi sponsored by the ethics committee of the US Congress and while doing so also talked to the opposition parties in India. She did the same in Syria, met with opposition parties and Assad, and in that case with a long time peace activist and former congressman Dennis Kucinich. The CIA simply wants to keep manufacturing wars and making sure the US population consents to war.

  10. Willpowerbomb | March 6, 2020 at 1:23 PM | Reply

    Nikki Haley will be the first female president.

  11. adayinforever | March 6, 2020 at 3:08 PM | Reply

    I mean we could all back Tulsi gabbard if getting paid by the military-industrial complex wasn’t more important to Rachel Maddow than having a woman president

  12. I think Warren’s dropping out woke up a lot of Americans. Did we miss the bullseye?

  13. No love for Tulsi from the DNC or MSM. No cries for sexism against her.

  14. She don’t need be no where around the white House crazy woman

  15. There is always a woman in the White House. 🙂

  16. Michael Oakes | March 6, 2020 at 6:22 PM | Reply

    Sanders needs to commit to a woman running mate; its way past time. But it should be a progressive. A woman of color, even better. So long as they are qualified. That said, please stop reducing Sanders to another old white man. He’s the first Jewish candidate. He’s the only one standing up for Palestinian human rights. He’s the first Democratic Socialist! He’s a true progressive. He’s also running an unprecedented grass roots campaign without corporate donors. That’s historic and revolutionary. He’s not bought. How’s that for diversity?

  17. Two multimillionaires complaining about their oppression…

    • Raul Esquivel | March 6, 2020 at 10:46 PM | Reply

      toemas8 Multimillionaires! My god the audacity! How dare anyone write a NYT best selling book and still pay their fare share.

  18. Michael Shane | March 6, 2020 at 7:18 PM | Reply

    The fact that they even mention Tulsi is sexist and proves that Democrats are only interesting in electing establishment puppets..

  19. It’s about policies not gender. She was doing ok until she became a sell out. She’s clueless.

    • nicholas schoonbeck | March 7, 2020 at 6:09 PM | Reply

      Nobody is saying she deserves the nomination because she’s a woman. We’re saying she’s so qualified & so good, its obvious that she lost because she’s a woman. She’s never sold out & every time I challenge a man on those sort of claims, they can’t prove it & eventually admit something like ‘her hair is just not presidential.’ & that, is about sexism & Cindy? White women are often just as guilty of that as men. You should be more aware of how sexism & misogyny work, especially because you seem to be infected by it.

  20. “If you cant and Kamala cant and Klobushare cant” and if Pete cant and if Styer cant, if Booker cant, if Bloomberg cant etc. Cry us a River Warren. You lost support because you lost yourself.

    • nicholas schoonbeck | March 7, 2020 at 6:10 PM | Reply

      Says a man. lol Who clearly can’t grasp how sexism works. Are you measuring your wrists already or not that far on the men’s rights evolution yet?

    • Anonymous Anonymous | March 7, 2020 at 8:17 PM | Reply

      That’s what she gets😊 cause she’s a loser. Bye bye loser😂😂😂

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.