WATCH: House Votes To Pass Rules For Impeachment Probe | MSNBC

The U.S. House of Representatives passed a resolution approving procedures for its impeachment inquiry into President Trump, opening a new and public phase of the process. Aired on 10/31/19.
» Subscribe to MSNBC:

MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, Meet the Press Daily, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House with Nicolle Wallace, Hardball, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and more.

Connect with MSNBC Online
Visit msnbc.com:
Subscribe to MSNBC Newsletter:
Find MSNBC on Facebook:
Follow MSNBC on Twitter:
Follow MSNBC on Instagram:

WATCH: House Votes To Pass Rules For Impeachment Probe | MSNBC

66 comments

  1. Good, let’s get this bozo out! Trump – “read the transcript” I did, you definitely had a quid pro quo.

    1. How muvh weed you smoke in a day.If that was a quid pro quo than every other president before the greatest president in US history (Trump) did the same thang.

    1. @Rye McKiwi Because he didn’t avoid being questioned about the affair as trump has avoided being questioned about all of the sh** that he has done.

    2. they lost on the whistle blower lying or being coached because of the transcript. they lost on the process because they have open hearings and representation. they lost on no quid pro quo because of their own admission. they lost on holding up the money because of testimonies. Now the only thing left will be that it doesn’t count as high crimes and misdemeanors, that’s the last goalpost they can kick it back to- so be ready for that next.

    3. E Earnest
      1.Trump has had no affair while in office and that’s not an impeachable offense anyway.
      2. Trump doesn’t have to release his tax returns, that is not a requirement and therefore not an impeachable offense.
      3. Trump has never committed money laundering therefore not an impeachable offense.
      4. Trump never colluded with the Russians your own Mueller investigation proved that there for not an impeachable offense.
      5. Trump never sided with Putin over any correct intelligence agency, your own Mueller investigation proved that therefore not an impeachable offense
      Would love for you to tell me the “so many more” false accusations you can make up and I will glad to call you out on them as well

    1. Lmfao, typical of the CUNTSERVATIVE BIGOTS and HYPOCRITES, and predictable of the MORALLY BANKRUPT Republican FASCISTS.
      R.I.P GOP

    1. We live in a “society”.
      The orange man is corrupt.
      Too bad nobody else sees it…
      Except me. There’s another guy I met years ago with green hair and looks like an evil clown. He lives somewhere in Gotham.
      Orange man is such a meme.

  2. Republicans demanded this vote so they could waste more time whining about how they don’t get what they want. They will do/say anything to obstruct the process.

    1. Kiflaam it’s not….Trump breaking all the laws, now trying to cheat to be re,elected…with Ukraine,, find or create dirt on his oppentes for potus, also if urkrain did that the would show aggression toward USA, which remove them from financial assistance from USA….giving Ukraine to ..putin, can’t fight Soviet Union, w.o USA financial help…..Trump, Dirty,low life person,,,all roads lead to ..PUTIN.

    2. Well Rob that’s quite spooky since she is deceased.  I had a dream that I had a whistle and you were the whistle blower.

    3. @biff binford Soviet style Kangaroo court? LMAAO!

      “…The next day, Robinson followed up his post with a YouTube video for Right Side Broadcasting, an avowedly pro-Trump “news” site that has since been banned from the platform. He reported that a group calling itself Anonymous America had compromised data from voters in twenty states pulled from Hillary Clinton’s phone-banking Web site. In his blog post, Robinson claimed that lifting information from Clinton’s Web site in order to undermine the campaign’s get-out-the-vote efforts wasn’t against the law because the data wasn’t secured. According to Robert Chesney, a law professor at the University of Texas, doing so could be considered a felony under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act…

      In any case, Robinson’s claim is a signal reminder that there are many ways to subvert an election, and not all of them require the machinations of an adversarial nation-state or a President trading foreign aid for dirt on his political rival. As campaigns become increasingly digital, with large troves of personal data collected, stored, and sold for political advantage, there is a growing threat that those tools are becoming fodder for small-time domestic operatives and anti-democratic foreign actors alike.

      https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/the-wild-west-of-online-political-operatives

  3. Thank you, Madam Speaker. Thank you! Whether republicans choose to fall on their oath and honor to protect Trump, the American people will now hear the truth.

  4. It’s sickening that so many people would avoid standing up for the truth just to avoid harassment from their co-workers!

    1. @Voyageur you murdered 5000 peopke in the ukraine. you murderered over 10 million in the ukraine prior. you are pure evil

  5. 2:02 “…there’s no reason to stick your neck out …’ because, yeah, your oath to the U.S. Constitution is no respectable reason … SMH

  6. When you think that you are above the law this what hsppens !!!!#What a great🎁t to give to Trump🎃🎊

    1. Actually, I’m one of ‘those’ that believe others are entitled to their own opinion. Free from browbeating when their opinions aren’t the same as mine.

    2. May day Nancy was not the only one who’s talk was slurred.. This is not me picking sides.. just pointing out I noticed a few of them on both sides with the drunk talk

    1. @Gregory Reimer – Prove your point. Sounds like a typical far right extremists Lazy Talking Point to all objective people. Do you think for yourself? Then explain this statement you a t like is a fact. Can’t win in the next election, that’s what trump says to people who just believe anything he says and repeat it like it’s true. If you are not a mindless gopher, then explain what suggests the Democrats can’t win next election. Can you explain your point and back it with facts/proof? Or are just a lemming saying what you are ordered to say? Polls? Approval rating? Last election? Where do you get this “fact” from?

    2. Democrats in Chicago under Daley had a 1960s slogan…”vote early….vote often”…nothing has changed!

  7. There you have it: “Nays” have sent the clear signal that they are pleased to be in the camp run by a former KGB man. Congrats, oh tea party patriots.

    1. @ Zar O He retired . Besides, how can you call this government boring? Dump45 keeps everyone on their toes with his doings, globaly. If that is not enough entertainment, I don’t know what is.

    2. @Wolfsong Moondancer the English guy retired? I just saw him on parliament the other day ….. Lately our government has been interesting but definitely not in the past.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.