68 comments

  1. if this is about “State Rights” vs. federal government … it’s *far* worse than just trying to take away Roe v Wade. 😱😭

    1. “Yeah I remember Roe and Wade. We worked in the mines back in Scranton. Wade had a orange lunch box and Roe drove the first Toyota I ever seen. No joke” Biden

    2. @Lively Heart At least the precious innocent little ones blood won’t be on the moms hands when she has to answer to God one day.

    3. @Jack Carraway duh but with limits and civil rights is damn sure one of them ✊

    4. @Tory Marsh your privacy isnt a constitutional right either, i guess you are ok with your state spying on you otherwise you are an hypocrite.

  2. People like you should be FORCED to bring up these babies personally to a very HIGH standard in all respects and be held accountable. Rather than make comments based on weak / pathetic religious beliefs and leave the child’s upbringing / future up to an all too common disastrous fate in third party hands, or incapable parents. You have NO idea, really!

    1. @staticsnow22 more kids would mean more spending on social services. Is that okay with you or is it now a socialist issue?

    2. @Brian Korth I’m willing to pay taxes if I know they’re going to be effective and serve the greater common good. My issues with taxes are that we end up spending nearly a trillion on the military every year, then arbitrarily throw money into foreign affairs like financial aid for Israel and Ukraine. The infrastructure and water are also atrocious; the education system is pathetic; and we take in like 2 million immigrants a year.

      Yet, no matter how many thousands of dollars we pay in taxes, we get the same old same old from our politicians who make the same promises election after election.

      But I’m by no means a capitalist. Both Capitalism and Socialism are evil.

    1. @Senia T in which case states like NY and CA would not be bound by the limits of Roe v. Wade.

    2. @Limbaughs Ghost How about Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, child labor laws, the women’s rights movement etc…

    3. @M.J. 👈🏼😂 Regarding child labor laws, “the first noted proponent of child labor legislation in the South was Edgar Gardner Murphy, an Arkansas clergyman. He founded the National Child Labor Committee (NCLC) in 1904 and attempted to organize support for child labor restrictions among mill operators. The year prior, Murphy gave what was later widely referred to as “the greatest speech against child labor ever” to the National Conference of Charities and Correction. In the speech, he called for a “crusade” to obtain uniform legislation against the evil of child labor.”

      Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Monthly Labor Review – January 2017.

      The Republican Party was the first to make as part of its political platform in 1912 advocating for limiting woman and child labor and enacting workers’ compensation legislation. Just like abolishing slavery, it took advocacy from Christians and the Republican Party to trigger a national awareness to a social issue most practical and prudent minded Americans could get behind – no thanks to the democrat party of slavery, segregation, and Jim Crow. I’m fact, the democrat party was too focused as it is today, in aborting children. You people could care less about children. Clown 🤡 …

    1. One things for sure. Biden and Kamala now will be able to speak clearly. They can do the political BS game. Not so much when it comes to real issues.

    1. @Joe Smith lol i guess in the end we all lose because irresponsible people raise irresponsible kids

    2. @Young & Handsome
      Yet you want to try to force them to breed anyway. No, there are many ways around it, and you can’t prove it wasn’t an accident, or that they ever were pregnant.

    3. @Zoom ShakaLaka Like I said. Stay away from kids.

      We can careless what they do with their bodies. The damage is to them not is. But once this is overturned, they will abide by the law. The fact that you’re saying they can still do it. Speaks of how lawless you guys are. But continue

    4. @Zoom ShakaLaka You ppl need help from the most high. Somethings not clicking to be okay with taking a human life.

  3. Leaks are intentional. One reason for leaking is to precondition the masses by creating expectations to facilitate passive acceptance of an otherwise controversial decision or even an expected hated decision by preemptively creating a catharsis. I think that could have been the reasoning behind this leak, given the likely furor over such a profound and dramatic shift in social policy this would represent.

    1. It could have been a woman that just wanted to get it out there before SCOTUS decided behind closed doors. Whoever it was, bless their hearts.

  4. Perfect timing for this “leaked” information. Right when 2000Mules is released in theaters. Now CNN definitely will cover anything in that movie.

    1. you sure making the rounds there Mike. You’ve been saying the same word post on a bunch of these videos here anyway happy Hanukkah

    2. @ES3 Absolutely….It only takes a few minutes going to each “Mainstream media” outlet and spread a little information. You have to try and post on the first day. Or the chances on anyone seeing a comment like this is slim to none.

    3. @Mike Joints
      Let’s go BRANDON, I agree….👈😁

      Liberal, “shenanigans” on the horizon,
      as their fear becomes overwhelming….

  5. We get the government we allow folks as a collective. Same government that let’s corporations plow all-sorts of money into politics 🤔

  6. Funny how just being asked to wear a mask to protect people became such a major screaming point about “My rights….my body”. Didn’t seem so concerned about the right to life then….infecting vulnerable people was fine. And many of them did die. Seems a bit of a hypocrisy happening here.

    1. False equivalence is a logical fallacy in which an equivalence is drawn between two subjects based on flawed or false reasoning. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency. Colloquially, a false equivalence is often called “comparing apples and oranges.” Wikipedia

  7. “It concerns me that after 50 years, we’re gonna decide WOMAN don’t have the right to choose”. IM OUTRAGED, ITS BIRTHING PEOPLE. Can’t believe this

    1. I hope our incoming justice is taking a biology class in case another case involving women comes forward.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.