The Ford franchise? Nanos: Victory could offer hints to federal CPC about how to win | TREND LINE

Nanos Research's Nik Nanos says that Ford's convincing victory in the provincial election could offer hints to the federal Conservative Party about how to win in Ontario.

Watch Trend Line's full break down of the provincial election here:

Subscribe to CTV News to watch more videos:

Connect with CTV News:
For the latest news visit:
For a full video offering visit the CTV News Network:

CTV News on Facebook:
CTV News on TikTok:
CTV News on Twitter:
CTV News on Instagram:
CTV News on Reddit:


CTV News is Canada's most-watched news organization both locally and nationally, and has a network of national, international, and local news operations.

50 comments

  1. I love Nick Nanos. His numbers are always bang on . . . and his conclusions are always miles off.

  2. The fact that party leaders are being excluded from leadership debates is all you need to know. This is not democracy.

    1. Youre right. We’re a constitutional monarchy that operates more like a republic. So you dont even vote for Trudeau or anyone else you still vote for the local guy.

  3. Doug did repel the mandates before election. Pierre is doing great and I will vote for him any day

    1. @VoteVer Crypto Enjoy the Tories being opposition for quite awhile if he wins the leadership!!

  4. Governing like a liberal. Yeah that’s really going to motivate conservatives at the federal level 🙄

  5. No actually what Pierre Poilievre is doing is better than ford and running on a platform better than ford

  6. Provincially I didn’t vote I live in a conservative riding last 50 years no need. federally I support and will vote for Pierre

    1. Get your membership before midnight tonight to help thwart the gaslighting Charest bots who will be ready to affirm an inexplicable upset against Pierre.

    2. @Jake Martin Charest has some issues when it comes to his credentials as a Tory because he’s pretty from the old wing of what was once the Progressive Conservative party that gave the country leaders like Diefenbaker, Clark, Mulroney, Campbell & lastly Peter Mackay!! Those guys outside of Campbell & Mackay were able to win elections because of their appeal beyond their base. The appeal Charest has is that he appears calm & level headed while at the same time can possibly make gains in Quebec which is what needed in order to form government.

    3. @Wilner Olivier Its great that so many Libs-NDP are concerned about PP. because you should be. He’s gonna win.

  7. Pierre knows 10 times more than Trudeau on how to run a country with fiscal responsibility.

  8. I love Nick Nanos. His numbers are always bang on . . . and his conclusions are always miles off.

  9. Wrong.. the reason Doug won Ontario is because of what Pierre is doing.. not the other way around.

    1. 100% agree. It’s all about the power balance. Pierre is making a movement for the next federal election

    1. @Thrill House let’s see how the 2$ and rising gas prices will fly with the general electorate!

  10. How did adopting liberal party polices work for Andrew Scheer and Erin O’Toole? That’s right they lost. Why would any one vote for a change in leadership that will enact the same polices as the current leadership?

    1. Andrew Scheer hardly adopted any Liberal policies. In the meantime though, Ford has touted his working relationship with the federal government. It wasn’t just Conservatives who re-elected Ford, it was also a lot of Trudeau voters.

    2. @mmjahink I was mainly addressing the criticism towards Pierre. What worked for Ford in Ontario will not work nationally.

  11. A shoo- in don’t need lessons in how to win. Go Pierre P. go. Maybe Pierre can put Turdreau where he belongs,. In jail.

    1. Pretty much, the only reason I voted for Ford was his willingness to listen to doctors to lockdown the province, deficit spend on infrastructure, and work with the federal government to attract EV and battery manufacturers.

  12. The fact that party leaders are being excluded from leadership debates is all you need to know. This is not democracy.

  13. Exactly ..Pierre IS “pragmatic, non ideological, consistent & not over the top” unlike sheer & ofool who were incompetent, weak, wishy washy & just “liberal light ideologicallt

  14. They’re right, it doesn’t make sense. Makes you wonder if the last federal election results were “cooked” in Trudeau’s favour…❤️🇨🇦🙏

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.