County sheriffs are vowing to stop the nonexistent 2020 election steal

Current and former sheriffs around the country are joining forces and conducting independent investigations, despite all evidence, into the 2020 vote. CNN's Sara Sidner reports. #CNN #News

41 comments

  1. Sheriff Richard Mack is a board member of the Oath Keepers. That’s all anyone needs to know about these guys.

  2. They always say β€œthere is overwhelming evidence” but not one of them can ever produce this evidence.

    1. Brian Ramirez Video. Let himself into server room and deleted files. Unauthorized entry with other peoples credentials. Search …. IT guy, Maricopa County.

    2. @Marc Lewis No. Of course, politics is involved, which is why they call them POLITICIANS. What is the meaning of politics? They are OPINIONS. When similar opinions are held by multiple persons … voila! … politics. I’ve watched the likes of Cheney, Nixon, Reagan (Who I voted for), Bush, Rumsfeld, G. Gordan Liddy. [You] Be consistent. If a Democrat does something criminal, I am with you to prosecute. If a Republican does something criminal, you defend them. You should treat them EXACTLY like you do to the so-called left that you appear to hate. …or more specifically , the concept, because I bet you that you have liberals in your family and you don’t hate them. (Which is a related concept, because I observe left tilted people to be more caring of others and right leaning people to be less caring of others. That is not to say one is bad and one is good. Actually both views have pros and cons. And that is what we should do work together … recognize the good and reject the bad. But I digress … bottom line treat everyone the same

  3. Instead of coming together to discuss ways to prevent further school shootings, they do this. THIS. Β 
    No wonder so many good, reasonable citizens have lost faith and trust in law enforcement.

  4. Geez…if they are that gullible, I would demand an audit on all investigations these County Sheriffs have ever been involved in😳

  5. It scares me that these people are in charge of enforcing laws when they have no idea what reasonable suspicion is.

  6. They keep talking about overwhelming evidence, where the hell is it? Being in law enforcement doesn’t give them the right to break the law, which those they are defending most definitely did. We don’t need anymore self appointed vigilantes and that’s all they are, vigilantes that happen to be wearing tin stars, who are upset that their tin god did not win. Meanwhile, he is still at large, inspiring violence against those who witnessed his criminal behavior, as he freely golfs and grifts the very people these sheriff’s should be protecting from him and his thuggary.

  7. Why can’t more interviews go this way with much more powerful figures? I love how she made him stand by his statement about the Nuremberg trials, you can’t just say some crazy sh** without being confronted about it…

  8. “Were looking into it” …..Code for: We don’t have squat but we wanna keep the lie alive.

    1. Cults will eventually commit the ultimate sacrifice for their leader, rather than accepting the truth. A clear and present danger.

  9. By far my favorite reporter at CNN, and this story demonstrates why; give her a promotion and more air time!

  10. I am so glad she gave him the response that he asked for when he compared the FBI to Nuremberg defendants. It didn’t work for them then, either.

  11. This is my county. Can you imagine how appalling I find Sheriff Jayden? OMG 😱. I hope he is voted out f office at the earliest opportunity.

  12. I love it when people take an oath of office to uphold the law and the Constitution and then decide on their own which laws they will enforce.

    1. Kind of like all these district attorneys in liberal ran cities? Not prosecuting criminals, and letting violent ones out of jail.

  13. A county’s sheriff has a spokesperson? In line with everybody (rich) having a lawyer I guess. Strange country the USA.

  14. “We’ve got a whole lot of reasonable suspicions.” Also known as DSBD, Demonstrable Signs of Brain Damage. Good work by the reporter.

  15. They feel their votes didn’t count because their candidate lost. What a rhetorical question. These people are so scary.

  16. He needs to talk to Ron Desantis about picking and choosing laws.

    I wonder how much he’s making from this scam.

  17. Best interview by a reporter ever. She was brilliant with the follow up to his bull. We need her to teach this method to other reporters.πŸ‘πŸ†πŸ’«

  18. Sheriff: “Its a long, drawn out investigation.”

    Thats bc there’s no case except the one you’re trying to create!

  19. When a society has “law enforcement officials” that cannot tell fact from fiction, nor understand what constitutes a reasonable standard of evidence, and are assuming the power of deciding what laws to enforce or not with no checks on their “activities”, that society has a huge problem.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.