Barrett Takes ‘Cautious’ Approach On Election Question | Way Too Early | MSNBC

Barrett Takes 'Cautious' Approach On Election Question | Way Too Early | MSNBC 1


Legal analyst Danny Cevallos weighs in on the confirmation hearings for Amy Coney Barrett and her remarks on if the president can unilaterally delay an election. Aired on 10/14/2020.
» Subscribe to MSNBC:

About Way Too Early With Kasie Hunt:
Way Too Early is your one-stop shop for everything you need to know to start your day. News, business, sports, weather, pop culture… you name it.

Every weekday at 5:30 am, we bring you all the breaking overnight news, what will be driving the day in politics, the top business stories that will be affecting the market, highlights from last night’s big games, the best of late-night television, the wittiest things fans of the show are saying online, and the national weather forecast with Bill Karins. All in just 30 minutes.

Way Too Early… your cram session to start the day.

MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, Meet the Press Daily, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House with Nicolle Wallace, Hardball, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and more.

Connect with MSNBC Online
Subscribe to MSNBC Newsletter:
Find MSNBC on Facebook:
Follow MSNBC on Twitter:
Follow MSNBC on Instagram:

Barrett Takes 'Cautious' Approach On Election Question | Way Too Early | MSNBC

48 Comments on "Barrett Takes ‘Cautious’ Approach On Election Question | Way Too Early | MSNBC"

  1. Her only way to ‘stay out of it’ is immediate recusal from any post election dispute because if it isn’t ACA, Roe and Obergefell she’s after, it’s being the only vote that counts if Trump refuses loss.

  2. “Cautious” like answering them correctly like a Supreme Court Judge should do? You’re not supposed to ask questions about what she will, might, could do you are supposed to ask about her record. She cannot accurately state her positions on any case till she is a Judge on the supreme court and reviewing the constitution against the claims being brought to court.

    • @R. Bond Because the law is the law. Just because she thinks the law should be different does not make it so. The law should be for the people not her personal opinion or cult beliefs!

    • @Grim Reefer exactly, which is why she cannot say how she would rule without reviewing the particulars of the case brought to court and compare to the constitution for legallity. It’s really not that hard of a concept.

    • @Grim Reefer get tf out of the country n take your participation trophy’s with you

    • @R. Bond Her cult and dark money will make her decision for her. She is already corrupted!

    • @Grim Reefer HAHAHAH Okay go get your tin foil hat

  3. lima leaf frog | October 14, 2020 at 8:58 AM | Reply

    We want judges who can be independent…dismissed!

  4. "Cancer What Is It Good For ! Making Friends ? " | October 14, 2020 at 9:01 AM | Reply

    We all Know now, The reason she was appointed,, Sad,, Till this point, I thought She did not know what this President will call her to settle,
    I will not question any more, The reason this President Wants Her there, and Why Now !

  5. The Justice’s integrity is on the line, along with the US Supreme Court. With all the coaching of the GOP, the risk is high

  6. If that is her answers.
    It mean she is against justice.
    It’s mean she is a puppet from Trump.
    The end of democracy as we know it.

    • Why would you say that? “I’m a non political judge, I won’t answer political questions” wow, super bad right?

    • Pretty good Guy | October 14, 2020 at 11:44 AM | Reply

      R U legal?

    • Let me see🤔
      An I’m legal?
      My ancestors always where from here.
      Yours not.
      So….yes I’m legal …you not.
      Another thing….
      Those are not political questions.
      Those are the people’s question.
      About Trump have power of stopping the will of the people is not a political question.
      Is a full legal question.

    • @Miguel Ortiz I recommend you do some better research 🙂

    • Reseach?
      I did….. A hole History sense the invasion of my country.
      My America.
      You interpretation of the law as convinius as your souls.
      Twist everything alone is for you interests.
      Blind and self fish…. That’s your history.
      That is the conclusion of my research and the research of the worldwide eyes.
      You nothing more then a joke to the hole world.
      Everybody can see what is going on.
      Except you all Trump supporters.
      Because you are enemy of the States.

  7. This confirmation was already decided before she even took her first question. Too bad, she is a Drumph puppet. She should not be on either side.

    • Regardless of who Trump picked, y’all were gonna slander them and make up lies. This is trumps 3rd pick, we already know what to expect from democrats

    • Karon Sanchez
      so you are saying that Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan were Obama’s puppets and Ginsburg and Breyer were Clintons puppets and pretty much today
      Democrat Puppets?

  8. aidan mcdonald | October 14, 2020 at 10:10 AM | Reply

    What’s the point of her being there, she has avoided every question by saying I’d have to look at it when it came before me, yet she’s commented and held a position on each of the subjects but is unwilling to publicly state her position now.

  9. Caroline Barna | October 14, 2020 at 10:18 AM | Reply

    You need to ask yourselves what is the role of a Supreme Court Judge? Playing into the political games is not one of them!!

  10. Only congress has the power to delay the election. I know this, she knows this…..she is just a trump puppet so she refuses to answer.

  11. Jean-Claude Arsenault | October 14, 2020 at 11:02 AM | Reply

    if you connect the dots, she spit out enough words, to confirm her priority will be to keep trump in power..

  12. Anyone who has a problem with the answers she’s given. Would not have a problem if the judge would be a liberal but because she’s a conservative everyone is upset. If ACB had given the same answers you guys would be applauding her.

  13. Scary she could not just “no”

  14. Doug Schaufele | October 14, 2020 at 12:01 PM | Reply

    Barrett: ” I don’t want to actually answer questions directly in case it upsets the President”

    • Doug Schaufele
      is that what the past Democrat nominees said? I remember Ginsburg refusing to answer many questions. That is what they do when
      Senators are trying to screw them up 😀

  15. She wont answer any questions ,why is she even their. Trump stooge


  17. Elizabeth Agnese | October 14, 2020 at 2:36 PM | Reply


  18. This reporter is clearly clueless on the extent of ACB’s knowledge and answer. So does the socialist/Dems at these hearings. It’s embarrassing to watch them.

  19. She still looks just like a sadistic nun.

  20. ACB and Ted Cruz are the two smartest people in that room. That is obvious.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.