Chris Hadfield on SpaceX rocket exploding: It was ‘enormously successful’

Canadian retired astronaut Chris Hadfield explains why SpaceX will learn so much from their giant rocket exploding after liftoff.

Subscribe to CTV News to watch more videos:

Connect with CTV News:
For the latest news visit:
For a full video offering visit the CTV News Network:

CTV News on Facebook:
CTV News on TikTok:
CTV News on Twitter:
CTV News on Instagram:
CTV News on Reddit:


CTV News is Canada's most-watched news organization both locally and nationally, and has a network of national, international, and local news operations.

54 comments

    1. “If it doesn’t explode on the pad we consider it a success.” ladies and gentlemen the new motto of Space X.

    2. @EinKerllol after creating the most useful rockets in history that went through the EXACT SAME processes of failure?

    3. In other words, the entire point of the test was to see if they could get it off the f–ing ground!

    1. @Captain Obviousit’s objective was to make it off of the launch pad, which it did complete. It’s next objective was to send back data so that they can make modifications to the next one, which it also did complete. Anything other than those two objectives were it excelling past it’s goals, which it also did. It’s went past it’s objectives and outperformed them

    2. @BartMan Comparing the development and eventual operational costs of Starship to SLS is crazy! NASA has stated that $500 million is a reasonable target cost per flight for the SLS program. Elon says a Starship launch could eventually cost $10 million or less! Also, SLS can only carry about 30 tons to orbit. Starship will be about 5 times that while reusable and almost 10 times the capacity if expended like the SLS! Ten times the capacity for 1/50th the price!

  1. Great coverage. Everyone else is painting the explosion as bad; probably for click bait.
    The Falcon 9 exploded multiple times, and it’s now the most reliable rocket in history

    1. I don’t think its for clickbait. The thing exploded. Of course, you can learn things from it, but its mission wasn’t to explode.

    2. @MelSuggs Artemis is made by NASA, but Starship is made by SpaceX. It wasn’t made just for Artemis. It was also created so SpaceX could launch a lot of cargo at once to the Moon and Mars.

    3. I would contest the point that the falcon 9 is the most reliable rocket in history. But yes this was a success.

    4. The explosion wasn’t the issue, the real problem is the ground equipment getting obliterated. Hope it doesn’t take that long to install a proper flame diverter.

    5. ​@MelSuggs because at the end of the day SLS, the only vehicle that could come close to this, will end up costing Billions of dollars per launch while Starship, when fully operational, will only cost the price of the fuel which would be low double digit millions. Without a low cost to space we will lose access to it.

    1. I’m guessing it was automated, like when Starship Superheavy abnormally drops below 30km, go boom, and boom again.

    2. I don’t think it was a difficult decision to make today. The final trajectory was very much not norminal.

    3. @Steven Veldt  I know. It wasn’t a criticism. I just thought that even with the learnings, it could be sad to destroy it.

    1. @MelSuggsdoes your plane have a payload capacity of 150T into low earth orbit? Does it have 3,300,000 pounds of thrust? Has anything even remotely like it ever been built before? Didn’t think so

    2. ​@MelSuggsBS if you say aeronautical engineer.

      Your plane literally has so much less energy to managed compared to Starship.

      Your plane doesn’t even match Falcon 9, the most reliable rocket right now.

    1. Yes. Moronic questioning. But Chris immediately disagreed and set him straight. Instead of trying to sensationalize, he could have tried to learn a thing or two before shooting his mouth off.

  2. What impressed me was the fact that despite the massive corkscrewing going on in the latter stages it still held together structurally.

    1. @Deploracle “Non-existent” isn’t really a fair assessment. We’ve seen rockets float sideways off the pad (Astra), we’ve seen rockets immediately pitch over and plow into the ground (Proton)… this one kept the flamey end and the pointy end pointed in the right direction up until the stage separation was supposed to happen. THEN stability went out the window… obviously.

  3. I live in Brownsville so as soon as it went up the whole city shook. What an amazing time to be alive!

    1. I know that area and I’ll bet the town shook! I just hope there isn’t a petition going around now from the Long Island resort to shut the launch pad down!

  4. I almost cried when I saw the rocket clearing stage 0. That is its own feat. Elon stated that there was a 50% chance of failure well-before the launch.

  5. It is so nice to hear from somebody who understand this stuff and love the progress – Big respect to Chris!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.