Conservative Party responds to Brown’s ‘phantom allegation’

Conservative Party President Robert Batherson responded to Patrick Brown's claims that his campaign hasn't been made aware of specific allegations.

Subscribe to CTV News to watch more videos:

Connect with CTV News:
For the latest news visit:
For a full video offering visit the CTV News Network:

CTV News on Facebook:
CTV News on TikTok:
CTV News on Twitter:
CTV News on Instagram:
CTV News on Reddit:


CTV News is Canada's most-watched news organization both locally and nationally, and has a network of national, international, and local news operations.

44 comments

  1. He lost as a ontario conservative party leader, he lost a candidate as a federal conservative leadership candidate and he might lose his re-election as a mayor of brampton next municipal election.

    1. That is because he is in the wrong party. He needs to join the Liberals where sleaze is respected. He would be a star in the federal or provincial Liberal Party.

  2. It isn’t that there is one allegation is that their are multiple reports & allegations a plenty , flying from both sides. Another hatchet job in the works or can the Elections Commission come forward and provide clear evidence. Or would that be too much to ask ? 0_o

    1. He had half the members as Pierre lol, I’m voting for Pierre and I’m not counted in his 300k… I’m sure others are as well.

    2. @David yea. Same here, all my family just bought ours through the official Conservative party site not his actual campaign. I know others have been saying the same as well… I bet he has 50-55% of the overall vote

    1. @Jordan disregarded covid protocol so he and his buddies could play hockey, used his provincial workers to help with his federal leadership run, there are a few more but you get the idea..

  3. Patrick do the job your being paid for being the mayor of braptom instead of trying to get another job ( with help from city of Brampton paid civil servants it’s alleged ).

    Should have to quit one office to run for another.

    1. Technically yes, but as politicians write the rules, and appoint those who investigate the rules, most you would ever get is a slap on the wrist, and a few thousand dollars in fines, certainly not enough to actually dissuade politicians from breaking the rules, as we have seen repeatedly over the years.

  4. Im starting to think Michelle Rempel Garner saw this coming and pretended to look at running at the UCP to run far away from this mess.

    1. I agree it actually makes her look that much better. I mean there are reasons why her and the other two MPs fled his campaign clearly some sketchy stuff was going on.

  5. The fact that Elections Canada are now going to be involved in this investigation means this is very serious.

  6. Everyone is so nervous Pierre is going to win…would be nice to get the Conservative party back.

  7. I am hope Election Canada will clear this up and make it transparent to the public.

  8. Even if it was Poilievre supporters that raised these concerns, if the allegations were without merit they would have been dismissed as such.

    1. Once opinions are made the damage is done. I dont trust POILIEVE either and am voting ROMAN BABER, where votes are strong in quebec.

    1. @Antiprog pragmatist yes. jagmeet can break the coalition for starters, and stop protecting him. I dont see why Trudeau can’t be charged federally, it seems plausible. Not every judge is willing to sell his morals.

  9. Was he being paid to be the Mayor while giving this interview at Brampton City Hall? Shows right there what he thinks about honesty

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.