51 comments

  1. Proves that all you need for experience, to hold a county or state political office is 100% ethics free and morals so low that you are dancing with the devil.

    1. Camden County GEORGIA DFCS, COURTS!…Woodbine County Jail, and SHERIFFS department need a DEEP INTERNAL INVESTIGATION regarding money laundering and MANY defected cases… the town is NOT as it seems. there are PLENTY of family and friends there and the whole city screams the same JUSTICE. OPRAH once labeled it as love town. so this need to be taken care of VERrry soon…πŸ™…β€β™€πŸ‘©β€βš–πŸ˜ 

  2. And in the future…:
    Traffic Court Judge: “How do you plead to this speeding ticket?”
    Defendant: “Your Honor, I request a special master to review the reading on this officer’s radar detector.”
    Judge: “Granted. We will reconvene in 23 years…”

    1. Actually you just don’t show up to court, say you just plain don’t believe in speed limits, that it’s a witch hunt, and issue a thinly veiled threat of what might happened if you are convicted. Then publicize the judge’s home telephone number and address and tell a bunch of crazy people that the judge hates ‘Murka

  3. So she is clearly in over her head, is there anyone that can β€œoversee her” or over rule….so we just let an incompetent person, make these hugely consequential decisions? C’mon now

    1. @Jinx Dragon they did. But can’t Justice Roberts pull the case, even hear it himself? Better than having Thomas and his pet dog who made nighttime trips to the White House to β€œadvise Trump, making the decisions.

  4. All these people need to be charged. This conduct is illegal, it’s that simple. No matter the party they are connected to, when you break the law, you must be held accountable. And messing with our election process should be taken very serious.

    1. αž˜αžΆαž“αŸ‹αžαŸ’αž˜αŸ… αžŸαŸ’αžšαž»αž€αž€αŸ’αžšαž‚αžš says:

      Support dears

  5. Who hired them and were they there in an official capacity? She, a county official, allowed them into her office knowing their intentions. This is an action in violation to her oath of office.

  6. How can one person stand in the way of our entire nations security? This is absolutely ridiculous & wrong on so many levels! 🀬🀬🀬

    1. @BRANDON – Where did CNN promise us Trump would be arrested? I’m thinking you made that up.

  7. Imagine if black, asian, native american, latino folk did this mess, they would be arrested right away. This is freaking terrible.

    1. @United We Stand it makes me wonder if and how long they have been getting away with doing things like this, and cant be the first time,..

  8. This coup is so much larger than initially thought. It is WAY past time to assign a special prosecutor to investigate all of this before it’s too late.

  9. “This is about executive privilege.” Executive privilege belongs to the current executive. If the current president declines to extend his executive privilege to his predecessors’ stuff, that should be the end of the line.

    1. @Eleni Rustames Please articulate the point you refer as I must have missed it.

      Much appreciation in advance. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ™‚πŸ€š

  10. That judge started out as she should have – By asking why they were bringing this request to her. She has/had nothing to do with it.
    Then, all of a sudden, she pulls a 180 and basically announces that she was going to grant the special master. And before she even heard arguments? Something smells here…..
    WHAT CHANGED?!?!?! Was she threatened? Was she bribed? Has anybody asked these questions? Why the sudden and drastic change of heart? We all know that’s magas go to reaction when somebody tells tfg no. To threaten, stalk, dox, harrass, etc.
    I think this needs to be investigated!

  11. The fact that the judge specifically states that this matter is differenet because it deals with a former president does in fact establish problems for the DOJ. Former presidents are not afforded any protections in the constitution and return to being private citizens after the term is completed. By claiming that a former president is entitled to ANY special considerations flies in the face of “all should be treated equally”. You can’t both sides this issue. You are either on the side of our democracy and no one is above the law or you are not.

    1. @Kimberly Evans DOJ should have arrested Trump when he was caught with stolen goods in his house. He deserves no more of a break as a, common run of the mill, shoplifter.

    2. β€œFormer president” that’s code. The translation is:

      β€œWe might make his voters/supporters mad, if we don’t extend special privileges to him”.

    3. @Willie white You’re absolutely right.
      People forget that, our DEMOCRATIC Constitutional Republic means:
      β€œGovernment of the people, by the people, for the people”.

  12. I believe that DOJ must appeal Judge Cannon’s ruling. It’s a very disastrous, and extremely dangerous ruling. The single-most troubling item that they should base an appeal on is the fact that Judge Cannon literally – written on paper, as Maggie Haberman pointed out – ruled that Donald Trump gets special treatment under the eyes of the law. That is absolute cowshit. The DOJ should appeal on behalf of EVERY SINGLE US CITIZEN. Otherwise, they are letting it stand that this “judge” has declared that some people – rich and famous people – are absolutely allowed to have a different set of rules and laws, and should be given much more legal deference than the “common rabble”. Baffling – mind boggling – completely un-American – and stupid.

    1. @david2869 any judge who is allied with a party over the duty to their position and rule of law makes that judge unfit. Failure to follow rule of law obove all else should be grounds for removal.

  13. So I’ll say it again: where is the American Bar Association in all this? If this judge is doing things poorly it reflects on the judicial system as a whole and aren’t the folks at the Bar Association supposed to be keeping lawyers in line???

    1. They need a referral from another Judge, group of lawyers. They are not there to police them, but the Bar Associations are there to investigate and punish those lawyers, like Powell and Giuliani, Eastman that step across the line.

    2. @Donna Cox Pretty much. The ABA can strip the judge of her legal accreditation but will not remove the judge from her position.

  14. the irony of the judge saying an investigation of a former Pres makes him look bad whatever the outcome is going to suffer the same fate herself and i’m here for it. all the cases she’s presided over need to be reviewed and herself investigated for corruption.

  15. What TF happened to integrity, morals and honesty? I’m in my 60’s and have a really hard time watching these immoral & , illegall acts.

  16. So just know: when these kinds of people accuse and insist on the malfeasance of others, it is only because they have done wrong or plan to wrong.

    1. Exactly. They’ve already vocalized all of their crimes as accusations of others so their idiotic followers will look the other way. It’s like a third of the country falling for a Nigerian prince scam. It’s embarrassing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.