64 comments

  1. Why is the DOJ so scared to indict this man? SMH, unbelievable! Is he ever going to be indicted for all these crimes?

    1. @Mark G Well, now I see that you really have blown a gasket…and your mind. I suggest you just leave this subject and yelling/arguing alone before you do something more stupid than just raise your blood pressure. Relax, take deep breaths. You believe what you want to believe, that’s your prerogative. It’s not worth yelling and screaming at a bunch of anonymous people that simply don’t agree with your narrative.

    2. @Alison Lambert Thatā€™s not my narrative. ITS THE FACTS JACK! Youā€™re making allegations of crimes that DOJ has refused to make in a court of law of any kind. Youā€™re citing statutes based on a presumption of guilt of a crime that hasnā€™t been alleged in a court of law much less charged for potential prosecution. ā€œTrust me broā€ is not a legal standard and conspiracy theories about espionage lifted directly from the plot of Mission Impossible are not actual crimes that there are the beginnings of even the slightest hint of evidence of to even take to a judge for a criminal complaint

    3. @weburnitatbothends Yes they found documents, if only they would specify what documents they are alleging are stolen or mishandled in court then they might have enough for a criminal complaint to impanel a grand jury. But they havenā€™t done that and you can not arrest anyone and hold them without charging them with a specific actionable crime.

    1. @JasonDrvmz who cares, if you can’t tell that USA is broken when less than half of voters support GOP, MAGA, QANON and Dopey Orange Boy then there is something wrong, rip the band aid off, put him in jail, move on

    1. @Ren Sinclair What does Russia have to do with anything, I swear the ā€œprogressiveā€ left legitimately have baby brains, you guys just memorize buzzwords and talking points and just keep trying till you find one that fits. ā€œInsurrectionā€ ā€œRussiaā€ ā€œNaziā€ ā€œEspionageā€ ā€œObstructionā€ā€¦.

    2. You would think stealing classified documents & putting the country’s security at risk would at least put you in handcuffs.

    3. @E Major Sure would if DOJ weā€™re actually ready to make that charge , you cannot arrest someone and hold them for more than 1-3 days (depending) without charging them with a crime. DOJ has refused to even specify what documents they are actually alleging were ā€œstolenā€ or mishandled in court much less charge Trump with a crime and impanel a grand jury. But this country is full of gullible idiots that donā€™t understand how things work and just repeat MSM talking points and yell into an echo chamber. Happens on both sides but the left gets the benefit of not having to deal with pushback and never owning up to being wrong

    1. Republicans are now worried about Trump creating losses for them. They shouldā€™ve convicted after both impeachments. Are they sorry now? Their logic is twisted.

  2. Donald Trump’s team found two more classified files. Those are the ones that are convenient for him to hand over. The ones that he will use as bargaining units when it comes in real handy.

  3. Anyone who gives aid or support to someone guilty of insurrection is barred from public office. Preventing that is pure self preservation.

    1. @Atticus Walker His university and charity were not charged with crimes. They were civilly sued and as part of settlement agreements his kids agreed to not operate a charity in New York. Thatā€™s gonna be null and void the second Tish James is out of a job. Also Iā€™m so tired of this nonsense about his university. IT WAS JUST CALLED TRUMP UNIVERSITY FOR MARKETING PURPOSES! No one believed it was an actual university, you canā€™t get a degree in a weekend from an unaccredited for profit business seminar. šŸ¤¦šŸ¼ā€ā™‚ļø Trump didnā€™t even run the thing!

    2. They gave support when they voted against certifying Biden, there were no discrepancies in the 2020 election, yet they stoked that lie.

    3. @E Major Thatā€™s not how that works. There were discrepancies and regardless you can make objections in Congress and delay certification, Democrats did so in 2000, 2004 and 2016

    4. @E Major Making legal objections isnā€™t by default immediate guilt of supporting an insurrection. Thatā€™s not a thing but I wholeheartedly encourage Democrats to take that idea to court. šŸ¤£šŸ¤”šŸ¤¦šŸ¼ā€ā™‚ļø

  4. Any action that can be accused of political motivation only harms the potential for justice. While there is no doubt of guilt, no reason for doubt is the long road back.

  5. Hey, the Federalist Society hasnt spent 40 years and who knows how much money stacking the courts for NOTHING. They are about to finally get a return on this very long term investment. investment in politics is the most lucrative thing there is.

  6. No, the judge is telling them to take the more common course of charging donnie with theft and have him arrested.

    1. @Chuck Rambo Too complicated. Trump is strictly tic-tac-toe and refuses to play unless you let him go first, like the child he is.

  7. Has to be a list of every classified document that existed during trumps presidency and where they are and which is missing.

  8. It’s very good to hear the reason for the judges decision. DOJ, we’re waiting for you to wield your power against Trump the criminal.

    1. @harry lazard and we waited for Dump to lose the 2020 election by millions of votes then to hear him cry about getting ā€œrobbedā€ Oh wait, weā€™re not waiting for that anymore šŸ˜‚

    2. @zenoist2 weā€™ll just for starters: treason, terrorism, attempted coup, attempt to overturn an election, attempt to assassinate his own VP, fraud, theft, tax evasion, collusion, stealing classified government documents, botched covid response leading to a million dead Americans and counting, intimidating witnesses. I could go on but youā€™re too far into believing heā€™s god and dems eat babies

  9. So, this judge said anyone can just withhold evidence and nothing will happen to them except to tell them “go play nicely now.” Weak legal system we have.

    1. If you weren’t so inept. You would know the court told the DOJ to do its own job. Leave it up to a commenter to know nothing about the legal process.

    2. No, they said if Trump is in possession of stolen documents, the DOJ should charge him with that crime. They donā€™t need judge to hold in contempt, they need a jury to decide if he is guilty or not.

  10. I spent 3 days in jail once for summary (basically arbitrary) contempt merely because I told a judge ā€œI donā€™t like your attitude, eitherā€ after he told me he didnā€™t like my attitude. I appealed and my contempt was vacated, but I spent the time in jail for an improper alleged contempt. Trump commits a major felony and merely told to work it out. I was charged with a minor misdemeanor.

    1. If you have inside knowledge and hard biased evidence that Trump committed ability bring it to me immediately. We have looked for crimes that he mightā€™ve committed during the four years that he was president and we found none. We look for crimes that he has committed since he has been away from DC and we have found none. People donā€™t understand it all former presidents have access to classified documents. All former presidents receive timely national security briefings that contain classified information. This classified information hoax is just another scam in an attempt to ruined Trump and his political rooms because heā€™s caused so much damage to the corrupt and infringed political class. We see them trying to get even now.

  11. I saw another interpretation of Judge Beryl’s ruling, which is that she wants to send a message to DOJ that they should treat DJT like any other citizen. If DOJ isn’t satisfied that all classified material has been recovered, then follow the normal process anybody else would be subject to. Secure warrants and search all the properties. The fact that TFG’s lawyers have said there are no more outstanding documents, while yet more have turned up is in itself probable cause justifying more warrants.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.