66 comments

  1. What do you expect U.S. authorities to say – that the drone contains valuable information so that the Russians will double down on trying to retrieve it?

    1. @Accutronitis The 2nd I just wonder if the Russians will try and replicate the technology though since the US has more advanced technology.

    2. @Ronmake It’s advanced. But they CAN’T do that. They couldn’t even blow the drone up but you think they can erase the storage device? Again, you cannot erase a storage device that fast. Please think about it a little bit more, we couldn’t even destroy the drone, but you think we can destroy JUST a tiny part inside of it? Why would that make sense?

    1. โ€‹@James green how did your lot get on in Afghanistan in the 1980’s Ivan, sorry, James? Yobt tvoyu maht.

    2. โ€‹@Thomas Keenan I saw your only aircraft carrier last week. It was 80 miles, just over the horizon, but f*ck me the smoke ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚ that’s before another ‘discarded cigarette’. The Russian Navy is just like the FaZZcist President, living well in the past.

    3. โ€‹@Thomas Keenan let’s all laugh at Ivan shuffling between his multiple troll accounts, earning his pickled cabbage ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

  2. The amount of call of duty experts wondering why the drone doesnt have a self destruct method is hilarious ๐Ÿ˜‚

    1. @THE ZOLDICS It’s not secret tech; many, many have gone down in the thirty years they have been in action, they’ve been widely documented. Nobody can learn anything new from RE on this thing.

  3. Remember when Iran got hold of a u.s drone, then couple years later Iran came out with the same looking drone

    1. So, we should strengthen support for Ukraine, as the year of Russiaโ€™s war against Ukraine has shown, Russia is getting weaker every month.

  4. As a war expert with over 10 years experience of call of duty. I must say that the drone should have had a self destruct button.

    1. you can bet they “format” the software and data,,
      At the altitude it was and if it face the water it must be in thousand of pieces

  5. Couldn’t have been more deliberate if the Russian pilot would have got out and rode the thing while taking a selfie.

    1. Iran ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท had two American made F-14s flying in the jets radar blip, things were very primitive regarding visuals on radar, it was a terrible day the Iranian F-14s bugged out and the commercial flight got shot down. Alqiada blew up pan am 103 a year later. โœˆ๏ธ

  6. US: โ€œWe made it very clear this is unacceptableโ€
    Russians: โ€œme not speak Englishโ€

  7. They could even save sailors trapped in one of their subs 30 years ago because they couldnโ€™t find it. I doubt they can recover anything from this drone. The thing was the size of a small aircraft, it most likely was completely destroyed when hitting the water.

    1. The “Kursk” incident was in reality the first test of a “reverse surfacing” operation, a Russian specialty last april performed with perfection in the Black Sea by the cruiser “Moskva”.

    1. @dannonyogurt98 you don’t have to be a Russian troll to mock the people who say things like “thoughts and prayers” lol

    2. โ€‹@dannonyogurt98 stop misgendering the drone, her pronouns are she/it. Rest in pieces she-drone ๐Ÿ˜‚

  8. People fail to realize just how expensive and difficult a operation to recover anything that deep in the ocean would be assuming they can find it

    1. โ€‹@JediMind Trix In the cold war times that would be plausible.

      We already know a simple simulation of how the devices would work (hooking it up to a supercomputer) bam. Can analyse how it works without needing it to be functional.

    2. โ€‹@zix zix zix Visiblity? Are you still living under a rock. From cold war times ships snd submarines have been able to fund things they cant see simply from echo waves of sonar.

    3. @Kurosai006 Ichigo Sonar?? You obviously don’t know what you’re talking about. The most useful tools use photogrammetry, long-range optical metrology, and OBVIOUSLY AUV video.

  9. Russian pilot’s version of account: I was just flying along minding my own business and drinking my breakfast Vodka smoothie when the drone put itself on reverse and struck my aircraft.

  10. “Learn what’s possible” all the interesting parts are sourced in bulk from countries that won’t deal with you due to attack on Ukraine. It’s a plane with some recording technology and optics that MIGHT be interesting or new but manufacturing it is always the hard part. The rest is just a well built motor and transmitter/receiver with standard IMU(s). Maybe the airframe has some stealth material but looking at the shape I kinda doubt it.

  11. Ivan took out a $32 million drone by pissing on it. US took out a $1500 chinese balloon with two missiles, each costing $400k. Kudos to Ivan.

  12. From what Iโ€™ve heard, drones operate with radio frequencies in which they communicate and also transfer information, and if that frequency is found, then that frequency is no longer hidden and can be monitored along with other issues it brings

    1. There is a bit more to encryption and cryptography than just knowing a radio frequency that might change every second ๐Ÿ˜‰

  13. First….just to recover something from the bottom of the ocean… is very dificult!! Russia can send ships… and take some plastics from the drone…. but if the drone is down …forget!!! Keep strong Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿผ

  14. Thatโ€™s a TOP GUN moment for sure, maybe he didnโ€™t see the propeller but it doesnโ€™t matter he hit it and everyone I know says thatโ€™s a very mean trick.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.