Supreme Court to hear case with major implications for voting rights

63 comments

  1. Given the supreme court’s decision to allow states to control our body, it’s basically self-defense at this point.

    1. @J R You don’t want to make the argument? Anyone can come on YT and simply usher folks to “research on your own”…

    1. 1 Mz Peachez Fuk what you saying it here ๐Ÿ˜  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zrfSK6pnpQ

      Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. ๐Ÿ˜ 
      5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ˜ 

      Saludos desde la Cd.. de world ๐ŸŒน๐Ÿ˜‰๐Ÿ’–
      los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer

  2. I wish the us would take hints on how to do elections from Europe, holiday for voting or doing it on Sunday, mail in voting per request with no excuse with plenty of time ahead, free id for everybody. anything less than that is voter hinderance

    1. @AdeptPaladin Iโ€™m simply saying we donโ€™t have a pure democracy. Iโ€™m sorry that it went over your head.

    2. @AdeptPaladin iโ€™m not against mail in balloting or absentee balating for cause. What Iโ€™m against is mass mail in balloting and Iโ€™ve already explained my reasons why.

  3. Why are they even taking the time to hear arguments when each justice has already made up their mind? Wonder how this will be decided?

    1. 1 Leon Leon Fuk what you saying it here ๐Ÿ˜  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zrfSK6pnpQ

      Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. ๐Ÿ˜ 
      5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ˜ 

      Saludos desde la Cd.. de world ๐ŸŒน๐Ÿ˜‰๐Ÿ’–
      los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer

  4. Election Day should be a national holidayโ€ฆ
    Whatโ€™s the argument against that idea?
    Actually askingโ€ฆ

    1. @Reid Simonson Certainly! Working ONE Sunday in year is nothing. I currently work in a hospital.

  5. The great thing about the US is the governments belief in humanity, law and, economics… unfortunately not in that order.

    1. What side has all the firearms, controls all food production, energy production and has most of the former military and police on their side? Are you sure you want to see a revolution, really sure?

    1. Not really because theres always courts higher as well as congress , nobody in government has enough power

    2. @BuffaloConfidential That’s why Trump won the popular vote both times, right? Er…oh wait.

    1. 1 chavo 426 Fuk what you saying it here ๐Ÿ˜  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zrfSK6pnpQ

      Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. ๐Ÿ˜ 
      5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ˜ 

      Saludos desde la Cd.. de world ๐ŸŒน๐Ÿ˜‰๐Ÿ’–
      los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer

  6. He starts off so well, does he realize that changes to voting in PA wasnโ€™t done by the state legislatures which is unconstitutional as ruled by PAโ€™s state court.

    1. 1 Patrick Fuk what you saying it here ๐Ÿ˜  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zrfSK6pnpQ

      Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. ๐Ÿ˜ 
      5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ˜ 

      Saludos desde la Cd.. de world ๐ŸŒน๐Ÿ˜‰๐Ÿ’–
      los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer

  7. If state courts canโ€™t strike down state laws (even partially), then the whole system of checks and balances go kablooeyโ€ฆ

    1. The state courts have no authority to change statewide election laws according to the constitution. The State’s legislature has to vote amongst themselves to change election laws . In this case the court abused its authority and overrided States legislative branch this has nothing to do with checks and balances.

  8. It doesnโ€™t matter what the issue is; just ask yourself, โ€œwhat would a demon want?โ€ Hope you donโ€™t believe in god or grandchildren.

  9. Just another reason why I love living in Arizona. Best state in the country. Letโ€™s go brandon!!

  10. The founders intended that the legislators compromise and get laws passed.
    Itโ€™s not a bad thing that one side canโ€™t ram laws through or the executive branch can use its agencies to de facto make their own regulations.

    The agencies should be in charge of enforcement of the laws โ€ฆ nit make the lawsโ€ฆ

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.