Chief Justice To Be ‘Master Of Ceremonies’ More Than Judge At Senate Impeachment Trial | MSNBC

61 comments

  1. When do we wake up and start calling this a Dictatorship? Like all dictatorships this one needs to end by an act of the people.

    1. doggiesarus
      A dictatorship is a corrupt congress that uses every event that come along to impeach a sitting president. I can’t wait to vote the democrats out in November …

    1. ****MEDIA FAIL**** — MSNBC only tells us half the story on the Chief Justice presiding over impeachment. Yes, we understand the rules give all the power to Senators on how to conduct the trial, but what MSNBC leaves out is that any Senators seeking to subvert justice would be making the Chief Justice complicit in turning a very important legal proceeding into nothing more than a kangaroo circus. Any Chief Justice worth his salt will put a stop to such nonsense, or let those partisans seeking to subvert justice know that they will pay a heavy price.

      Will the Chief Justice sell out the Constitution for partisan purpose? Will Republicans Senators look to alienate the Chief Justice, who is their vital swing vote on the SCOTUS? Or, will they FINALLY conclude that their efforts gaslighting, covering-up, and protecting a lawless, sociopathic President are far more damaging to them and the GOP? Because in the end, the Chief Justice and those Republican Senators are just as much on trial before the American people as is Trump. These are the questions the media should be asking, the points the media should be stressing to inform the public. Media BE better, WE be better!

    1. When has any constitution ever been taken seriously by the elites anywhere when it gets in the way of their looting and pillaging ?

    2. @skutch Blobaum Will concede your point, but still would like for somebody to answer (o even address) this question.

  2. Whoever heard of a trial where the so-called ‘innocent’ defendant demands no witnesses? McConnell and Graham have openly admitted it will be a rigged trial. The Dems are just doing what they can to try and force some kind of legitimacy into the trial.

    1. @Todd JenkinsWhy would I help people who don’t like me have my head. Screw that. Trump Impeachment witness links are to PBS NEWS Youtube channel so you can hear it from them cant use the excuse FOX none of them are. Every witness was asked if there was quid pro quo ALL SAID NO AND NO EVIDENCE!!THERE WAS NOT ONE!! Just feelings or heard from someone
      Ambassador Taylor could not identify an impeachable offense https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJcv2pQ1PsU
      Mr. Bill Kent never met with the president https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCSBd580P2A
      Dr. Fiona Hill Wasn’t there just heard from someone who heard from someone https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6l23Z115DuY
      secretary David Hale was unaware of any infareous activity with aid https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yic0B8AsdMQ
      LT.Colonel Vindman (who never met Trump or ever ben in the same room) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czz2tYEhgNc
      Ms Williams even rejected the Democrat talking point that bribery was invoked here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GBmG2kIp0k
      ambassador Volcker said that there was NO quid pro quo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G21tIkehPko
      Mr. Morrison said there was nothing wrong on the call https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G21tIkehPko
      gordon sondland who spoke to the president United States and the president said I want nothing no quid pro quo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_c17vxrPWQ
      Rep. Stefanik Blows Apart Schiff’s Impeachment Narrative on Ambassador Gordon Sondland: No Bribery, No Quid Pro Quo, No Treasonhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hi7iwYkUcFM
      So you obviously don’t know what your talking about THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF QUID PRO QUO BY JOE BIDEN https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBGKEfcj76Q&list=WL&index=95&t=0s

    2. ****MEDIA FAIL**** — MSNBC only tells us half the story on the Chief Justice presiding over impeachment. Yes, we understand the rules give all the power to Senators on how to conduct the trial, but what MSNBC leaves out is that any Senators seeking to subvert justice would be making the Chief Justice complicit in turning a very important legal proceeding into nothing more than a kangaroo circus. Any Chief Justice worth his salt will put a stop to such nonsense, or let those partisans seeking to subvert justice know that they will pay a heavy price.

      Will the Chief Justice sell out the Constitution for partisan purpose? Will Republicans Senators look to alienate the Chief Justice, who is their vital swing vote on the SCOTUS? Or, will they FINALLY conclude that their efforts gaslighting, covering-up, and protecting a lawless, sociopathic President are far more damaging to them and the GOP? Because in the end, the Chief Justice and those Republican Senators are just as much on trial before the American people as is Trump. These are the questions the media should be asking, the points the media should be stressing to inform the public. Media BE better, WE be better!

    3. NO INNOCENT ..”DEFENDANT”… CALLS FOR WITNESSES WHEN NO CASE HAS BEEN PROVEN AGAINST THEM…AS THEY DON’T NEED ANY….. ARE YOU AWAKE?,,,WOW

    4. Captain Clone
      The democrats wanna get rid of that, the first amendment and electoral college; but they “had to protect the constitution during impeachment in the house” 🙄

    1. Patrick
      We had 17 witnesses and 4 constitutional professors in the house inquiries. If the house wasn’t satisfied with the witnesses, why did they go forward to impeach?

    2. Patrick the truth channel Democrap minion not hearsay moron the TRUTH! I hope for your sake you figure it out one of these days but I doubt it after all you are a Democrap! LMFAO!

  3. why bother having the chief justice if they’re not calling witnesses and it’s going to be a sham??? ANYONE, ANYONE???

  4. What’s a trial without witnesses or evidence? It’s called a cover-up. And the American people will be watching.

    1. @Brenda Zorros you guys are so off .most of us do not watch fox or cnn or any of this lying tv garbage .catch up

    2. @Brenda Zorros why do you mention Fox news on a MSNBC video comment section ? Obviously we all watch MSNBC . You are very confused

  5. “Trial” that’s being generous. The GOP is going to vote to adjourn after they’ve finished reading their prepared lies.

    1. @Your Big Head Cousin NO NEED TO BE SORRY DEMOCRATS COULD NOT MAKE A CASE!…IT WAS 100% A SHAM FROM DAY 1 OF THE PRESIDENTS BIG WIN AGAINST THE ANTI CHRIST!

    2. Your Big Head Cousin
      Let me get this straight. It sounds like the democrats want to control both the house and the senate in this impeachment and if any republican votes against impeachment, they’re against the constitution … The democrats have gone absolutely insane 🤣🤣🤣🤣

  6. The pride he must feel overseeing a sham “trial” designed to cove-up a crime. I have no respect for American laws anymore.

  7. It’s hardly a trial when the jury needs an endorsement from the defendant… Calling it a trial is a lie at this point..

    1. @berdboy . No. They proved he held the money based on that meeting. He’s definitely guilty. It’s just matter of whether you care about your cult or our country..

    2. @Terry Tater UMMMMM NO ..NO THEY DIDN’T…GO BACK AND WATCH THE PROCEEDING AND GET BACK TO ME WITH WHAT SONDLAND SAID AT THE END.. THE OTHERS WERE NOT WITNESSES..

    3. @berdboy lol. You’re saying he didn’t hold the money based on the meeting?
      It doesn’t matter. Bolton is gonna lie for him anyway.
      Fake trial with fake witness and fake jury..

    4. @Terry Tater HE HAS EVERY RIGHT TO WITHHOLD THE MONEY FOR ANY REASON HE WANTS……SORRY…AND BIDEN WILL BE INVESTIGATED ….WATCH

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.