Foster: Meghan’s racism claim on a different level for Royal family

CNN's Max Foster says that Meghan Markle's claim that the palace raised concerns about how dark the color of the her son Archie's skin was going to be is on a completely different level compared to past criticisms leveled against the British royal family.
#MaxFoster #Roayls #CNN


  1. 😂😂 It’s Shocking that one of most dominant SLAVE TRADE outfits in the West has a Monarchy that’s racist? Color me bemused

    1. @Michael Morningstar It’s interesting through all this dialogue you have not made one point. Just bad grammar and spelling and no points. The whole group is waiting Morning Glory. 😉😛

    2. @Michael Morningstar Why am I a racist? By the way you spelt hypocrisy incorrectly. 😜😉 You didn’t do well at school?

    1. @dhouse609 Harry was 20 years old…many people do stupid dumb insensitive things, yes even racists things at 20…This cancel culture that penalizes people for past mistakes that happened when times where different and they were different is the height of stupidity. That was 16 years ago, everyone changes in 16 years. Given the fact that his wife is one half black, not 1/8 1/16..tells you Harry is not racists. So you need to climb another tree…in regards to Prince Harry.

    2. What 11 year old doesn’t know better not to dress up as a Nazi let alone 20? I am sure Harry is a nice guy and I bet he did not receive much love when he was young. That is why he is not manning up and taking a leadership roll in this situation. I still don’t believe anything of what the princess said on Oprah. People that are not princesses, have to go through real life, people who have to work to survive, have more crap to worry about then if someone doesn’t like a skin color. Every day CNN and the other news stations are completely racist against white people. I have to listen to billionaire Oprah lecture about white privilege while I am just making my bills every month. While the price of food, cloths, and heat keeps going up.

    3. @dhouse609 No Nazi uniform while sitting with Meghan and Oprah! For that, rather than sporting a tailoured suit as befitting a prince, he chose one from J Crew! I’m sure millionairess Meghan and Billionairess Oprah were impressed.

    4. People always quick to judge , but it’s so funny that they don’t look in their own backyard. Harry did what any average person would have did for his family. People this man is in love. People Harry was like his mother. William wish he was like Harry, if you look at how his wife looks in pictures and video’s , she looks miserable. Meagan and Harry was smart to get out of it. So they can make their own decisions. They don’t have to worry about what to wear they could wear what they want now.

    1. The young woman who traveled alone to Britain was of legal age in Britain …..
      But I don’t know anything about others

    1. No one does. This is just a distraction from what’s really going on in the royal family. Lots of eyes are on prince Andrew atm.

  2. The inbred Charles ought to be ashamed of himself …….. doesn’t he remember everything he and his family did to Princess Diana? Prince Harry is a real man for protecting his family over some racist institution. Big love to Prince Harry, his beautiful graceful bride, darling son Archie and the new baby on the way. 💕

    1. “”twoWorld “” needs to look into MM’s past to know what type of woman she isbefore msking any remarks.

  3. Really backwards when they can’t accept someone who is half Black into the Royal family, yet Charles brought in a mistress into Diana’s home. And now they have the gall to call her “Duchess Camilla”. Diana’s famous interview where she said “There are 3 of us in this marriage.”

    1. @ljlallier You’re wrong. I rewatched that interview and Diana was talking about Camilla. She states it herself. Why don’t you stop writing lies if you don’t know the facts? Smh

    2. A breakdown and betrayal in a marriage are a far cry from Meghan Markle’s *_allegations!_* it is also something that was not brought to the attention of anyone until MM and Prince Harry obviously wanted something from the Royal family! Funny thing, that little nagging fact!

      Also a little nagging fact? The Queen and/or other parts of the Monarchy could have made sure that Meghan never became a Royal if they, in your ignorant words, “… can’t accept someone who is half *_black (COLOR NEVER REQUIRES CAPITALIZATION! [sic])_*_ into the Royal family…._ Good grief, talk about “gall”. One has nothing to do with the other, and for informational purposes, the last that I heard, people were actually wanting *_equality,_* NOT *_superiority!_* Stop following the divisive people and divisive media who have agendas they wish for you to follow!

      Seriously, Harry most likely never intended for that conversation to become a thing on the world-wide stage. He shared a private conversation with his wife, who, for reasons yet unknown, chose to make it much uglier (not to mention very public public!) than it most likely was ever intended, or was meant to be. Now he is back-peddling by not saying _who_ he had that conversation with. That is just wrong on so many levels on their part, and yes, Harry is also to blame for that.

      Remember that MM has been proven a liar and a person who _exaggerates_ before. Remember that Meghan is also a known manipulator, and possibly blowing someone’s ignorant statement or question into full-blown racism is a far different thing to use as comparison as fidelity in a marriage between Harry’s father and mother! MM is what is backwards. She is a manipulator, and only crybabies like her, with victim mentalities, are going to take everything that she says at face value!

      Sadly, and to the disappointment of people with common sense, that number is too high, and the media outlets and media personalities (and celebrities!! GAH! SMDH!) are having a field day with their interview! They knew when they spoke what the Monarchy and the Queen would do! What they have done for millennia! Handle it *_privately, not publicly!_* ~Peace!

    3. @fenixrising1972 like seriously u even lie 😃😃😃😃 to protect camila but will never tell the true to defend Meghan she was telling the truth this is too serious

    4. If she wasn’t accepted, she won’t have been allowed to marry Harry. She was accepted. The Royal family are NOT racist

  4. when you can just smell it in the air “Racism” you can just smell it everywere,and its a stench you can not get out your nose

    1. You are so dam right. I do have an allergic reaction to racism, it’s like a hayfever you get from pollens that can be coming from a long distance.

  5. Prince Charles did not protect his wife Diana , now the opportunity comes for him to protect his son and daughter in law. His response is to STOP taking his son’s calls when his son needed him this most. And this character is to be KING. What is the use and purpose of this firm/ institution again. Can someone explain this to me. Very sickening!!

    1. @elenal2012 I mean, where did ‘the institution’ say that this was their position? The Oprah interview is second or third hand information.

    2. @elenal2012 That’s an incorrect and abusive comment, I’m afraid. It is the person who resrorts to name-calling and personal put-downs in a discussion that causes the problem. It also weakens their argument. If you speak to other people like this you might get a much less pleasant response at some point that this one. Blessings to you.

  6. Princess Diana has been vindicated if no one believed she was mistreated by the royal family. In her own words she said they just didn’t care.

    1. @Stephen Valentine in interviews, she did not play the victim however , she stated facts and how they contributed to the death of her marriage.

    2. @Stephen Valentine , she said in an interview, “ there were three of us in this marriage, so it was a bit crowded “ she held that marriage to a higher standard because Charles was heir apparent. If Camilla wasn’t in the picture, Diana would have moved mountains to stay married.

  7. I really like this discussion. Many excellent points were made. I wish Harry, Meghan and their children every happiness.

  8. Harry and Meagan can finally raise their family without being scrutinized by the British media & live happily ever after!

    1. They have been living in the USA for one year and the British press have not stop running their papers with lies after lies About them.

    2. They will still be criticized. The foreign tabloid press will still contact her father and half sister to lead them into terrible narratives against her and Harry.

  9. It just dawned on me that not only has Harry lost his mother now he’s lost his father. How cruel.

    1. @estelle pryce it’s actually not about family. It’s about an institution called the monarchy and a birth right.Elizabeth, Charles, William etc are temporary custodians for this period in time. If Harry has alway felt trapped (Megan is an irrelevant distraction) then it’s good that he has left. But he needs to grow up and stand up, a 40 yo man crying about daddy cutting off his allowance, Get a job lad. (Not that he needs the money, he’s been given 100 million plus.) The good news is Harry wasn’t the heir just the spare for a while.

    2. @estelle pryce You clearly know nothing whatever about the UK, the monarchy, or the individuals involved. You could try fact checking, before turning this ridiculous episode into a soap opera of your imaginings.

    3. @Brett Nine I don’t think they understand how unimportant Megan (and Harry) are in the big picture. Most probably couldn’t name Charles’ siblings (well maybe Andrew of late). I imagine they will fade away, they can only make a living off “bitching” for so long.

    4. @Liam Gross Yes, I don’t see a bright future for them. Those hysterically supporting them now, particularly their VIP supporters will evaporate quickly once the light dawns, that they’ve been conned. The monarchy has survived war and strife. It will certainly survive a soap star, and a foolish prince.

  10. The Royals looked the other was when Charles was married to Diana but had a concubine and then married said concubine. Very pathetic.

    1. @York T To add to your comment, I would also ask what the heck the OP’s comment had to do with it either, lol? People are going rabid, and Meghan Markle’s supposed experience on the racism front was not *_to her,_* it was most likely an ignorant, and stupid question or statement made from one family member to another, *_NOT_* made by “the Palace”! Sheesh, I am so over “Harry and Meghan”. Time for them to shut up and move on now that they have had their say, and have at least attempted to tear down an millennia-old Monarchy. That’s just my opinion of the whole mess. ~Peace!

    2. @mayra v So? Firstly, what does any of this have to do with any of what is going on right now? Secondly, are you bigoted? Oh, of course not, lol! You are only suggesting that Prince Charles should have chosen a person of color to fall in love with, then have an affair with while married to Princess Diana, right? You are not slighting him for choosing someone to have an affair with, divorce his wife for, and will make her his Queen Consort one day, right? You are just hating on them because she is WHITE, lol. And that can’t be bigoted at all. Because everyone has not seemingly forgotten what the definition of “bigoted” actually is, noooo!

      Yes, the vast majority of my comment to you is called, _sarcasm!_ Sheesh! You all need to move on already! ~Peace!

  11. Baffles me how a family that defines inbreeding can think in this day in age that there superior because of it.

    1. “Divine Right of Monarchy” is more than just a sentiment. It’s the foundation of the CHURCH of England, which is still part of government. Mistaking this for “racism” is what this family hopes. The alternative is much more damaging than the expected bit of casual racism this has become. Harry’s great uncle had to leave the family, abdicate the crown, and lost everything for a white woman. Harry’s dad had to marry Diana because Camilla wasn’t as “pure” as Diana. Both white women. Yes, this is about “breeding,” but not just about race.

    2. @Max Covfefe The government in the UK is entirely secular; the monarchy has no direct political role. Remember that Catharine (William’s wife, so the next future queen) is a commoner – her mother was an air stewardess

    3. @Rob England Entirely secular? That’s a bold claim when so many of their state-funded schools are parochial. Kate is a distant cousin to Diana and William.

  12. Jimmy Kimmel had the best take: You know things are bad when you come to the USA to escape racism.

    1. @Wild Hearts The great grand son of the queen doesn’t get a title no matter what his skin color might be. It is just a fact. It would depend on who is going to be the next King/queen. If Prince Harry is the brother of the King, then does his son even get a title?

    2. @dhouse609 I’m not sure where the proof us, but we are definitely one of the least racist countries there are. We have the unique experience of many cultures and races coming together over hundreds of years. Huge mistakes and lots of growing pains along the way, and we continue to promote tolerance and unity despite the media.

    1. Prince Andrew situation could end the royals if the truth comes out. This situation with Megan will not help them. But I expect the British press will try to twist it somehow. Perhaps as a country vs country thing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.