UC Davis Rolls Out Free Saliva-Based COVID Testing For Davis Community | Stephanie Ruhle | MSNBC 1

UC Davis Rolls Out Free Saliva-Based COVID Testing For Davis Community | Stephanie Ruhle | MSNBC

 

Thousands of front line workers are getting vaccines right now, but it could be months before they reach the general public and we need more testing. Associate Dean for Public Health Sciences at UC Davis Health, Dr. Brad Pollock, joins Stephanie Ruhle to break down where testing is being done right and why. Aired on 12/15/2020.
» Subscribe to MSNBC:

MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, Meet the Press Daily, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House with Nicolle Wallace, Hardball, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and more.

Connect with MSNBC Online
Visit msnbc.com:
Subscribe to MSNBC Newsletter:
Find MSNBC on Facebook:
Follow MSNBC on Twitter:
Follow MSNBC on Instagram:

#DrBradPollock #COVIDTesting #MSNBC

UC Davis Rolls Out Free Saliva-Based COVID Testing For Davis Community | Stephanie Ruhle | MSNBC

30 comments

  1. I mean it’s not just Davis… In Riverside you can easily find testing site and even be able to make same day testing appointment. And for free for sure.

    1. @S Hogan actually I’m a real American native American not like you he offspring who’s migrant great grandfather who was from Europe, second I went to Cambridge university in he UK one of the best on earth also Oxford university has made a life saving vaccine so shove that your migrant offspring arsehole Hogan ,

  2. Wait are they using the Canadian salt water swish test? It was discovered in B.C. and my son had a salt water swish test in Nova Scotia shortly thereafter. We only use it on children because the nasal swab is the most reliable and accurate. Took us about 24 hours to get negative results back

    1. Amen, sister. power to the poor, which is most of America!… That is better than power to the 1% who can careless about anything other than their pocket.

  3. _YOLO county_
    You’d think that was in Florida.

    Innovation is great. But we need a wide assortment of tests, putting all our eggs in one basket would be a horrible idea. If there was a flaw with the test or its components, or we run into supply (chain) issues, we’d all be in BIG trouble.

    1. It’s not reliable at all. The Covid “tests” are useless and “cases” mean absolutely nothing due to this.
      Read for yourself.

      https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/

      Also, go to he “Covid tests” FDA Emergency Use Act Letters, the Pharma Companies themselves, along with FDA state these “tests” aren’t determining a true “infection” of SARSCoV2. Research yourself, please!!!
      Decide for yourself, please don’t blindly trust what you’re told. This is found in test package inserts (if the test has one, some conveniently don’t have them) or in the FDA EUA letters:

      “Results are for the identification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA…….Positive results are indicative of the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA; clinical correlation with patient history and other diagnostic information is
      necessary to determine patient infection status. Positive results do not
      rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent
      detected may not be the definite cause of disease.”

      Please read this very carefully – “other diagnostic information is necessary to determine INFECTION STATUS. They are testing for an RNA ASSOCIATED with SARS-CoV2 but NOT EXCLUSIVE to it, can read “postive” from colds, flu or bacterial infections. Tests are completely UNRELIABLE.

      Also, the FDA regulates what Pharma can print about these tests, they state the following: * I capped for emphasis

      “Conditions Related to Printed Materials, Advertising, and Promotion”

      “No descriptive printed matter, including advertising or promotional materials, relating to the use of your product may REPRESENT or SUGGEST that THIS TEST IS SAFE or EFFECTIVE for the DETECTION of SARS-COV-2”

      Did we all read this correctly? Let’s read it again, just to really take this in.

      “Conditions Related to Printed Materials, Advertising, and Promotion”

      “No descriptive printed matter, including advertising or promotional materials, relating to the use of your product may REPRESENT or SUGGEST that THIS TEST IS SAFE or EFFECTIVE for the DETECTION of SARS-COV-2”

      Directly from FDA & PHARMA COMPANIES.

      Find many FDA EUA letters here
      https://www.360dx.com/coronavirus-test-tracker-launched-covid-19-tests

      https://hitconsultant.net/2020/04/23/in-depth-32-fda-approved-covid-19-testing-kits/

  4. We don’t need a vaccine for something that isn’t even present in the population the way we’re told, yes,the RT-PCR aren’t reliable.

    The Covid “tests” are useless and “cases” mean absolutely nothing due to this.
    Read for yourself.

    https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/

    Also, go to he “Covid tests” FDA Emergency Use Act Letters, the Pharma Companies themselves, along with FDA state these “tests” aren’t determining a true “infection” of SARSCoV2. Research yourself, please!!!
    Decide for yourself, please don’t blindly trust what you’re told. This is found in test package inserts (if the test has one, some conveniently don’t have them) or in the FDA EUA letters:

    “Results are for the identification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA…….Positive results are indicative of the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA; clinical correlation with patient history and other diagnostic information is
    necessary to determine patient infection status. Positive results do not
    rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent
    detected may not be the definite cause of disease.”

    Please read this very carefully – “other diagnostic information is necessary to determine INFECTION STATUS. They are testing for an RNA ASSOCIATED with SARS-CoV2 but NOT EXCLUSIVE to it, can read “postive” from colds, flu or bacterial infections. Tests are completely UNRELIABLE.

    Also, the FDA regulates what Pharma can print about these tests, they state the following: * I capped for emphasis

    “Conditions Related to Printed Materials, Advertising, and Promotion”

    “No descriptive printed matter, including advertising or promotional materials, relating to the use of your product may REPRESENT or SUGGEST that THIS TEST IS SAFE or EFFECTIVE for the DETECTION of SARS-COV-2”

    Did we all read this correctly? Let’s read it again, just to really take this in.

    “Conditions Related to Printed Materials, Advertising, and Promotion”

    “No descriptive printed matter, including advertising or promotional materials, relating to the use of your product may REPRESENT or SUGGEST that THIS TEST IS SAFE or EFFECTIVE for the DETECTION of SARS-COV-2”

    Directly from FDA & PHARMA COMPANIES.

    Find many FDA EUA letters here
    https://www.360dx.com/coronavirus-test-tracker-launched-covid-19-tests

    https://hitconsultant.net/2020/04/23/in-depth-32-fda-approved-covid-19-testing-kits/

  5. We NEED to put the pressure on president joe biden for executive action on student loan forgiveness on day one.  As the law allows.  Studentloanjustice.org

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.