Why former Trump White House lawyer thinks Trump will go to jail

Former Trump White House Lawyer Ty Cobb explains to CNN’s Erin Burnett why he believes Trump will go to jail amid news from multiple sources that the special counsel investigating the former president will receive 16 records that show he knew the correct process for declassifying documents.
#CNN #News

84 comments

    1. THE GREAT THING IS THAT WHATEVER COMES OUTTA HIS MOUTH CAN ALSO BE USED AGAINST HIM TOO & WILL BE=OOOPSY πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

  1. Trump-“….they automatically became declassified when I took them!”
    Trump’s attorney Palatore-“I QUIT!!!!”
    πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

  2. The thief says, “No! I do not possess any valuables belonging to other people!” (At the moment I stole them, they started belonging to me!)

    1. @Loladaise I see what you did there. But I’d like to point out. It’s better to remain silent and be thought a fool then to type on the internet and remove all doubt.

  3. “We’re all pretending we’ve got a lot to show for it, because admitting what a disaster it’s been is tough to digest. But come on. There isn’t an upside to Trump”.

    – Tucker Carlson Fox News

  4. This country is beyond insane to let this ish continue. You indict him and have a trial. Let the chips fall where they may. My God.

    1. He’ll never ever do a day in jail. The justice system isn’t equipped for this. It’s for the little people.

    2. Exactly what the holdup,let’s make this happenTrump supporters know Trump deserves to be in jail.Great comment. πŸ‘πŸ‘

    1. ​@Genon Bradford BUT OF COURSE SINCE THEY’RE THE POORLY EDUCATED ONE’S πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

    1. President Biden to Giuliani: “Hey Rudy, give me $5 million dollars and I’ll pardon your boy, Donny.
      We’ll split it, I get 99%, and you get 1%.
      And, just so you know, there’s a 100% tax on your 1%.
      Thanks buddy! It’s been a pleasure doing business with you!”

    2. U believe that woman who claims rape but wont go to the police to report it? πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

  5. He always says Presidential Records Act for the Fox “News” viewers because they won’t check and she should have pushed back on that statement from him.

    1. They should have at least had a panel of very well known legal experts on stage with him. Every time he made a false statement they could weigh in with a True or False buzzer. In the days after, they could each show the laws as they are written as opposed to the laws according to Gen Pop and Trump’s empty head.

    1. If Biden needed over 25,000 troops to guard him from the people on Inauguration Day,then it’s clear that he wasn’t elected by the peopleπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ’€.

    2. what’s the difference between a garbanzo bean and a chickpea?
      A: Trump never had a garbanzo bean on his face.
      (Mr. Sherwood)

  6. I imagine that informing Trump of the law and proper procedure was the first thing The Archives communicated when they contacted him initially.

  7. Trump talks about himself – Trump brand, I, me, my, mine –
    while Biden talks about America – Americans, us, we ours
    The difference, with trump it is always about Trump and what Trump will get out of it. While Biden has alway seen it as service to the people.
    It is both simple and obvious

    1. ​@Loladaise most Americans and the world will be laughing at trump forever moreπŸ˜…πŸ˜…πŸ˜…πŸ˜…πŸ˜…πŸ˜…πŸ˜…πŸ˜…πŸ˜…πŸ˜…
      His legacy and yours πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

  8. At this point, I’ve even stopped tapping my shoes waiting for Dumpster Trump to be indicted and jailed after a trial.

    1. Actually, Jack Smith could be all set to indict trump on whatever charges. But Merrick Garland could veto the entire thing if he wants to. It’s Garland’s call, unfortunately.

    2. If Biden needed over 25,000 troops to guard him from the people on Inauguration Day,then it’s clear that he wasn’t elected by the peopleπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ’€.

  9. What more could Jack Smith possibly want? Alot of the work was done for him by the Jan 6 Committee, the GA DA Grand Jury, and the FBI in the Mar-A-Lago raid. This must move forward now, not later.

    1. Remember, it’ll probably be a dragnet like no other, pulling up a straining net full of weird, deep-dwelling, gelatinous miscreants, writhing blindly in the exposing light of justice.

    2. If Biden needed over 25,000 troops to guard him from the people on Inauguration Day,then it’s clear that he wasn’t elected by the peopleπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ’€.

    1. Unfortunately, psychology has shown this to be the case. Not that lies become a truth but that repeating even lies will eventually be believed by large portions of the population. We have a critical thinking brain drain on the undereducated conservative side of our population.

    2. Well, it’s always worked that way before for him, right? πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ

    3. @Clem Fandango Me as well after all they too are my fellow citizens. I’m more outraged by the Billionaires using their platforms to manipulate the minds of people that don’t even know they’re being played.

    4. If Biden needed over 25,000 troops to guard him from the people on Inauguration Day,then it’s clear that he wasn’t elected by the peopleπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ’€.

  10. Trumps best defence …is for trumps lawyer is to say our client is extremely stupid and doesn’t have a clue about any protocol on this because he golfed most of the time !

    1. @dral9657 — I am curious; are you from the UK? (In the US, the word “defence” is more commonly spelled defense.

    2. ​@Linda S-K – Kind of a stupid question because you answered it yourself through your deduction that it was a British spelling

  11. Funny how just about every single person who ever worked closely for Trump later ends up coming public with their disdain for him.

    1. If Biden needed over 25,000 troops to guard him from the people on Inauguration Day,then it’s clear that he wasn’t elected by the peopleπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ’€.

  12. Since when does not knowing about a law constitute a valid defense? That’s not how it works.

    1. Every, and I mean every, court that I sat in, ignorance & stupidity was NEVER a valid defense…

    2. Especially in case of a public official who has a duty to know these laws and swore an oath to uphold and defend them!
      I don’t understand how his possible ignorance is even relevant in this.

  13. And as he said in the same town hall, that he had the β€œabsolute right” to not only take whatever he wanted, but to show whoever he wanted. I just can’t wait for a Judge to look him in the face and say, nahhhhh… πŸ€”

    1. Yeh but problem is,any judge who does that will face backlash, threats, and likely physical violence.

    2. @Chinedu Opara how about you go and read the law they put in question. Here’s the Presidential Records act. The Presidential Records Act (PRA) of 1978, 44 U.S.C. ß2201-2209, governs the official records of Presidents and Vice Presidents that were created or received after January 20, 1981 (i.e., beginning with the Reagan Administration). The PRA changed the legal ownership of the official records of the President from private to public, and established a new statutory structure under which Presidents, and subsequently NARA, must manage the records of their Administrations. The PRA was amended in 2014, which established several new provisions. As you can see the documents he took were “public” documents meaning that after his administration/term was over he could keep documents that were used.
      Again people cant use their brains and only blindly believe others without using common sense. Go back to kindergarten to learn common sense k.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.